![]() |
![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
I get that it is easier to break up teams. I am not asking for an analysis of every weight class and then break them up. I am asking for a process that benefits wrestling just as they have implemented a process that benefits basketball.
All I am saying is that if the sectionals are set up according to geography which it appears as though they are, keep the regionals and sectionals the way they are but use the placer percentage system that the NCAA uses. The more placers you have out of your sectional, the more qualifiers you get. It would not be that hard. Other states do it. So could we. There would still be some weight classes in some sectionals that there are great kids that don't make it down but it levels the playing field a little bit. |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
They dont have to use geography
Lets face it if one sectional stretches from St. Louis to the southwest suburbs, to the Iowa border, to the Wisconsin border; then geography doesn't matter. I posted a month ago about this ridiculous sectional and got almost no reasonable feedback. If it looks , walks, and quacks like a duck...... The assumption that they couldn' swap Lockport with Bremen or HF with LWC or Providence is absured. I'm sure solutions near west and near north would work just as well and provide for a better individual as well as dual team championship.
Last edited by geo; 01-18-2009 at 09:15 AM. |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|