Release the Kraken

[HuffHall]

Blah blah blah blah, there's nothing here, just grasping at straws to try and distract from the obvious, He lost end of story. You're a complete kook, stop going down these rabbit holes and rejoin reality.

[MAL]

Big Tech is too big.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My0I2M4w_fI

[oldpioneer]

The man held a press conference to announce that the dow hit 30,000. Couldn’t that have been a tweet. Then he wouldn’t be peppered with questions and seem evasive as he walks out of the room.

[MAL]

The man held a press conference to announce that the dow hit 30,000. Couldn’t that have been a tweet. Then he wouldn’t be peppered with questions and seem evasive as he walks out of the room.

I think he predicted 30,000 in his first term. The media called him crazy. You know how his ego is.

[oldpioneer]

I spoke too soon. I guess his kids started tweeting about the 30,000 under his presidency. A bunch of people pulled up his tweets about the Dow going up when he was elected but I guess it dipped a little during inauguration. And of course there were like six tweets of him saying that his influence on the market should be judge from the time he was elected not inauguration. His tweets age like fine wine

[MAL]

I spoke too soon. I guess his kids started tweeting about the 30,000 under his presidency. A bunch of people pulled up his tweets about the Dow going up when he was elected but I guess it dipped a little during inauguration. And of course there were like six tweets of him saying that his influence on the market should be judge from the time he was elected not inauguration. His tweets age like fine wine

I think I remember the Dow going down on election night because nobody expected him to win and they had to change their bets. The media went nuts about the coming market crash under Trump.

[oldpioneer]

The stock market on a given day is merely a snapshot. The last four years I’ve heard more about the daily stock market prices than I ever have before. Just like a marathon run in the Casino unless you cash out at that moment it really doesn’t mean a hill of beans. So we just had an election and states are now certifying the results. In the last two days President Trump allowed the incoming administration to take part in the transition. What do you attribute the recent spike in the stock market to?

[MAL]

The stock market on a given day is merely a snapshot. The last four years I’ve heard more about the daily stock market prices than I ever have before. Just like a marathon run in the Casino unless you cash out at that moment it really doesn’t mean a hill of beans. So we just had an election and states are now certifying the results. In the last two days President Trump allowed the incoming administration to take part in the transition. What do you attribute the recent spike in the stock market to?

I'm no expert in the stock market, but it is clear that the news of a vaccine so we can end the shut downs will cause the markets to explode. There will be some bets placed on where they think the government will be dumping the next big pile of cash. That is why the stock market can thrive under most presidents...they follow the money.

[MAL]

This is interesting, but I am not sur that I trust Skinny Joey Merlino.

https://buffalochronicle.com/2020/11...-on-joe-biden/

[MAL]

AG Barr cracks down on Philly Mafia: 15 indicted on racketeering — ‘Skinny Joey’ starts to sweat

https://buffalochronicle.com/2020/11...no-in-trouble/

[MAL]

This report found the 300,000 votes cast by Skinny Joey.

https://www.scribd.com/document/4845...oad&from_embed

[MAL]

MICHIGAN WITNESS SPEAKS OUT — SAW THE BIDEN BALLOT DUMP AT 4 AM AND WITNESSED TAMPERING WITH TABULATORS! (VIDEO)

November 23, 2020 IMlllcntcK




Another witness has come forward to describe what she saw at the vote-counting in Detroit. Articia Bomer, a candidate for office said that she saw multiple instances of voter fraud.

She has given a rundown of the things she witnessed during the counting of the votes and the list is quite long.

Here is what Bomer claims she saw:

• Hearing an announcement of 50 boxes at 4am: the Biden Ballot Dump!
• Hearing that the Biden Ballot Dump was counted and processed in an impossibly short amount of time
• Witnessing officials TAMPERING with tabulators at the TCF Center!
• Ballot harvesting operations being done by a local Church
• Poll workers overriding the actual votes, and changing Trump votes to BIDEN!
• Poll workers REFUSING TO COUNT Trump votes!
• Poll workers bringing in luggage and boxes that could have contained illegal ballots
• Poll Workers using deceitful tactics and colluding with Democrats to try and EXPEL GOP Poll Challengers
• GOP Poll Challengers being EJECTED from observing the vote count
• GOP Poll Challengers were observing ILLEGAL BALLOTS and their objections were IGNORED
• Poll workers being obvious Democrat PARTISANS
• Suspicious meetings of the poll workers

Bomer makes the claim that she saw a Detroit poll worker use correction tape that would cause the machine to show an error that another poll worker could then “correct.” Bomer said that it is the poll worker’s job to make sure the counting is secure from tampering. She says that she informed GOP lawyers on the scene and apparently they did nothing.

If what she says is the truth, this is huge. There is shenanigans in every election in Detroit, so why would you find it so hard to believe it wasn’t this time? This is especially true when they refused in many cases to allow Republican observers close enough to see what was going on.

And when an observer saw something funky and raised an objection, the Democrats running the count refused to take the objection. I cannot honestly say there was massive cheating in this election but I do strongly feel it is important to find out if cheating diud take place and you should be for that no matter which party you belong to.

Sweeping everything under the rug will convince many people that our elections are no longer secure. Let’s face it, Biden was drawing just a dozen people to his rallies and now he set an all time record for votes? It just does not make sense. But, if he did win honestly, he should welcome an investigation that will prove it.

[HuffHall]

Seek help MAL, seriously

[dadudaman4]

Yes, Mal, we don't want to ensure that future elections are properly run. The only thing that matters is that Trump lost, by any and all means possible. You can be sure that if Biden had lost under similar circumstances, Huff, Chief and Oldie would never, ever have thought about investigating the election results. No way!

[MAL]

by Simon Fish

Executive Summary

We find considerable evidence consistent with the possibility of electoral fraud in vote counts in Montgomery County, PA.

In particular, we examine a highly anomalous update to mail vote totals in the NYT/Edison data which enormously benefited Biden, and which looks suspicious on a number of dimensions.

At a high level, our results are suggestive of a new and highly suspicious batch of mail ballots being added to the count sometime between Wednesday early morning and Thursday morning. These ballots are drawn from an implausible distribution that enormously favored Biden and simultaneously harmed Trump (the latter being done in addition by allocating more votes to Jorgensen). Said mail ballots end up being extremely different both from the mail ballots that came before (as measured in NYT data), and the mail ballots that came afterwards (as measured in the county’s own data).

The key evidence is as follows:

⦁ On Thursday November 5th at 9:09am a large batch of 90,022 mail/absentee votes get added that has over 95% support for Biden, but total votes to go up by only 9,534, implying that in-person votes actually went down by 80,488. On its own, this is a very strange irregularity, as ballots cannot disappear, and in-person ballots cannot become mail ballots. Something is wrong in the reported data, the only question is what.

⦁ The new batch of 90,022 mail ballots looks nothing like existing mail ballots. If the update is a data error, it must be a complicated error along multiple dimensions and is unlikely to be a simple typo. The new batch is improbable on four separate dimensions:

⦁ It has a level of support for Biden (over 95%) that is statistically impossible to have come from the same distribution of mail ballots counted up to that point (74.9% for Biden)

⦁ Every comparison of pairs of candidates shows improbable changes. This is important, as it helps rule out the possibility that a single typo in the data drives the pattern.

⦁ Irrespective of the old distribution, the new batch is extremely unlikely on its own terms, as it has a ratio of support for Jorgenson relative to Trump (20%) that is higher than virtually every county in America. The last fact is consistent with aiming to get Biden’s vote share “high but not impossibly high” while simultaneously trying to not give any more votes to Trump than absolutely necessary.

⦁ The distribution of the ballots being removed from the in-person counts is even more implausible (98.1% Biden), making it difficult to explain the overall vote update as being due to genuine mail ballots having been previously incorrectly classified as in-person.

⦁ Anomalies of this magnitude are extremely rare in the NYT database. Montgomery’s reduction of 80,488 in-person votes is the fourth highest vote reduction in the entire database. Over half of these involve changes of less than 100 votes, and 28% involve changes of just one vote. Of the remaining errors, many can be easily understood as examples of exactly the phenomena ruled out above (e.g. simple vote-type misclassifications).

⦁ Independent confirmation of the two numbers suggests Edison’s numbers are accurate reflections of the County data. Edison’s report of total absentee ballots counted in their update at 5:43am Wednesday November 5th is very close to (and slightly below) media twitter reports of total absentee ballots counted a few minutes later in the county data, suggesting that these early Edison absentee vote totals are likely accurate reflections of the underlying county data. Meanwhile, Edison snapshots on November 8th precisely match County snapshots on November 10th.

⦁ To test this hypothesis further, and to help rule out the possibility that this is all due to NYT/Edison data errors, after the initial anomaly was uncovered, we scraped multiple snapshots of the county’s own data at the precinct level. The changes between the two snapshots reveal that the earlier arriving mail ballots (which included the anomalous update) show a significantly higher vote share for Biden than the mail votes which were counted later in the same precinct. This shows that something is changing in the distribution of mail ballots counted within each precinct, and the earlier ballots showed a stronger tendency to favor Biden.

Adding all this evidence together, there is a strong case for the following interpretation:

-Some time after election night, a very large batch of mail ballots were counted that showed an enormous advantage for Biden-This batch looks nothing like the mail ballots counted up to that point in the NYT data, and also looks different from the mail ballots counted later in each precinct as measured using the county’s own data
-The batch looks implausible on its own face, in terms of relative vote shares of Libertarian and Republican votes
-The updates are difficult to reconcile with simple data errors like genuine mail ballots being mis-classified as in-person, or a single candidate total being incorrectly entered as a typo.

These facts present strong circumstantial evidence suggesting fraud in mail votes in Montgomery County, and need to be investigated further.