Release the Kraken

[eyecu2]

More likely State prison than Federal prison. Between lawsuits, prosecutions, and bankruptcy the only one that is going to be in court more than him the next few years is Judge Judy.

[MAL]

You guys haven't figured out yet that almost every thing the main stream news has told you about him is a lie? How many of you were duped by the Russian collusion hoax when it was Hillary that colluded with a Russian to fabricate the fraud. How many of you fell for the Charlottesville "there are fine people on both sides" lie...all you had to do is watch the video. How many lies have I exposed about COVID...your party let people die when HCQ was available, just to hurt Trump...and Cuomo killed people intentionally by forcing COVID patients into nursing homes. The most recent impeachment managers were caught fabricating evidence. I don't see how you think It is ok for Joe to use his family members to collect billions of dollars from all around the world and give Joe his cut...most of it was our tax dollars...the rest of it was a down payment from China on the deed to the US. How can you guys be blind to all this? I can see that Trump is an a$$, but I can separate that from his policy. That seems to be all that you can see...I don't recall any policy discussion recently...do you just vote on personalities?

Sure, they will take him to court...they will probably even find a judge friendly to the prosecution...but you will only make him stronger. Here is how this works...I really don't like Trump as a human. The Democrat party has pushed me to the point that I don't think i would consider voting for someone that I like in a primary if Trump is in the race...That wasn't the case a few weeks ago.

[MAL]

He's irrelevant

If he was irrelevant, Lindsey Gram wouldn't have taken a trip to Florida to talk to him about the future of the Republican party.

[jay31]

You guys haven't figured out yet that almost every thing the main stream news has told you about him is a lie? How many of you were duped by the Russian collusion hoax when it was Hillary that colluded with a Russian to fabricate the fraud. How many of you fell for the Charlottesville "there are fine people on both sides" lie...all you had to do is watch the video. How many lies have I exposed about COVID...your party let people die when HCQ was available, just to hurt Trump...and Cuomo killed people intentionally by forcing COVID patients into nursing homes. The most recent impeachment managers were caught fabricating evidence. I don't see how you think It is ok for Joe to use his family members to collect billions of dollars from all around the world and give Joe his cut...most of it was our tax dollars...the rest of it was a down payment from China on the deed to the US. How can you guys be blind to all this? I can see that Trump is an a$$, but I can separate that from his policy. That seems to be all that you can see...I don't recall any policy discussion recently...do you just vote on personalities?

Sure, they will take him to court...they will probably even find a judge friendly to the prosecution...but you will only make him stronger. Here is how this works...I really don't like Trump as a human. The Democrat party has pushed me to the point that I don't think i would consider voting for someone that I like in a primary if Trump is in the race...That wasn't the case a few weeks ago.

So if I understand what you are saying, you are a one issue guy, and that one issue is “owning the libs”

[HuffHall]

But he's not a Republican, hahaha. You keep bending the knee to that POS, what a clown

[eyecu2]

Lindsay Graham, Kevin McCarthy why let facts get in the way, right MAL. I can see mixing them up. They are both spineless cowards. You should have cut and pasted instead of trying to think for yourself.

[MAL]

CONFIRMED! Dominion Voting Machines in Michigan CHANGED VOTES From Trump to Biden


A lawyer in Michigan, Matthew Depronon, has actually been performing an examination in regards to the voting machines that were located in Antrim County.

He managed to quickly form a group of seven very well-equipped individuals that have experience in the IT field.

The team showed up and quickly started work upon Mr. Depronon being given entry to the county building and immediately began accumulating the glaring proof.

The collection process was complete after roughly 8 hours. The evidence found included 16 thumb drives, 16 CF cards, and a multitude of forensic images of the voting machines. The investigators were promptly escorted to the local airport in Antrim county by the county’s sheriffs.

They were then given permission to board a plane with the evidence in hand. Mr. Depronon has reported that he should have the results of this investigation by sometime on the following Tuesday. However, he did not receive them until the end of last week.

Then, Depronon told Newsmax some bombshell information:

“Well the Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said it happened by human error. We discovered that’s not true, that’s a lie. It didn’t happen by human error. It happened by a computer program called Dominion Voting System. And through our lawsuit we were able to get access to the Dominion Voting System program and my team went on last Sunday and we took forensic images on that computer system, 16 CF data cards, 16 thumb drives, and we got the forensic image of the actual tabulation machine in the Antrim County clerk office.”

https://youtu.be/m5Aw2_tIhAI

It seems as though the voting errors did not occur by human error, but rather by a computer program called the Dominion Voting system.

So, basically what this all means is that votes were changed, and it wasn’t done through human error, but it was written into the code of the Dominion software, which is what we’ve already been told by the Trump team.

[HuffHall]

The same guy who accuses the rest of us of being brainwashed by the main stream media gets all his info from Youtube and newsmax. This troll never fails to produce the lolzzz

[MAL]

Lindsay Graham, Kevin McCarthy why let facts get in the way, right MAL. I can see mixing them up. They are both spineless cowards. You should have cut and pasted instead of trying to think for yourself.

Do you just enjoy being wrong?

GOP Senator Says Trump ‘Ready To Hit The Trail’ And Help Rebuild Republican Party With Eye On 2022


Sen Lindsey Graham has talked to President Trump and he says the president plans on being active in the 2022 elections. I take that to mean he will actively campaign against traitors in the House and the Senate. Many people are writing off Trump even though 91% of his voters still back him and he got about 75 million votes. You do the math. And many of the nine percent could come back.

Graham said on “Fox News Sunday.”:

“He’s ready to move on and rebuild the Republican Party and is excited about 2022.”

“I said, ‘Mr. President, this MAGA movement needs to continue.’”

“We need to unite the party. ‘Trump plus’ is the way back in 2022. Donald Trump is the most vibrant member of the Republican Party.”

“My goal is to win in 2022 to stop the most radical agenda I’ve seen coming out of the Democratic presidency of Joe Biden. We can’t do that without Donald Trump, so he’s ready to hit the trail and I’m ready to work with him.”

The people who are writing Trump off are the people who didn’t vote for him. His support from his voters is strong and they will follow him. Already states have been censuring members of the House and Senate who voted for impeachment. For example, only 13% of Wyoming voters say they will vote for Liz Cheney again. I expect her to announce she will not run for reelection and get buried in the primary.

Graham said that Lara Trump is now a shoe in to get the nomination to run for the Senate seat of Richard Burr. He says she is the future of the Republican party.


Graham understands that Trump pulled the party out of the dump and trying to desert him will destroy the party. They need to key on members of both houses of congress to vote both Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy and all establishment Republicans be relieved of duty.

[HuffHall]

Trumpism/MAGA just like Rush is dead, you'll realize it sooner or later

[MAL]

The same guy who accuses the rest of us of being brainwashed by the main stream media gets all his info from Youtube and newsmax. This troll never fails to produce the lolzzz

If you could provide a coherent counter point, we could have a conversation. I have provided you with concrete examples of main stream medial lies...your turn.

[MAL]

So if I understand what you are saying, you are a one issue guy, and that one issue is “owning the libs”

My single issue is the Constitution...it's what made America great...there is no other explanation. Without a constitution that defines what the Federal Government can not do, we would have been just like everybody else.

I find myself at odds with both parties...one more than the other, but they are both corrupted by power.

[MAL]

Just in case there is any question about the criminal conduct of the FBI and the Obama administration. You can click on the links for the official documentation.

Twenty days of infamy: the January 2017 red flags the FBI blew past on Russia collusion


Declassified memos details evidence that devastated FBI theories on Trump ... but did not stop the probe.

By John Solomon

Updated: February 18, 2021 - 7:32am

From its earliest moments, the FBI's Russia collusion probe was always fraught with warning signs.
Agents were told Christopher Steele provided faulty information, had likely been compromised by Russian intel disinformation, wanted to defeat Donald Trump, had leaked to the media and was being paid by Hillary Clinton, who herself might be carrying out an epic dirty political trick to vilify Trump with false information to distract from her own scandals.
Those intelligence reports alone should have given agents pause. The fact that Steele had been terminated by the FBI as an informant for leaking also should have weighed heavily.

File
SteeleFBIClosingMemi.pdf

But if ever there were red lights screaming for the FBI to end the counterintelligence probe, they were flashing during a harrowing 20-day window in January 2017 as Barack Obama was leaving office and Trump was coming in.
Between Jan. 4, 2017 and Jan. 24, 2017, nearly every major assumption of the FBI's Russia collusion theory was gutted, according to recently declassified evidence reviewed by Just the News.
Months of investigating Trump adviser Mike Flynn had turned up "no derogatory information," and agents recommended shutting down that part of the inquiry after concluding Flynn wasn't aiding Moscow. Two separate informant recordings of Trump adviser Carter Page — the target of an ongoing FISA warrant — produced stunning evidence of innocence.


U.S. intelligence had concluded a key allegation in the Steele dossier was Russian disinformation. And Steele's primary sub-source — whom the FBI assessed was likely tied to Russian intelligence — discounted much of the information attributed to him in the dossier. Even Director James Comey was telling colleagues there wasn't much corroborated in the dossier.

File
AG Letter to Chairman Graham 9.24.2020.pdf

And yet somehow, some way, the FBI accelerated the investigation even though overwhelming evidence showed — as lead investigative agent Peter Strzok would later text his colleague — there was "no big there, there."
"The evidence yelled stop, and we just hit the go button anyways," a senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the probe told Just the News.

Responsibility for finding out why — and whether any of those decisions were criminal — currently resides with Special Counsel John Durham.
Here is a timeline of evidence available to Durham that Just the News has gleaned from more than 10,000 pages of declassified memos, reports and documents we have reviewed since last summer:
Jan. 4, 2017
FBI agents who investigated Flynn's ties to Russia for months conclude there is no evidence he is a Russian agent and his case should be closed. "The absence of any derogatory information or lead information from these logical sources reduce the number of investigative avenues and techniques to pursue. ... The FBI is closing this investigation," the lead agent wrote in his closing memo. FBI leadership overruled the agent and kept the Flynn probe open, eventually luring him into an interview where they alleged he lied.

File
FBIFlynnCaseCloseMemo.pdf

Jan. 5, 2017
Comey and other intelligence officials brief President Obama on the status of the Russia probe. FBI notes from contacts with the White House during that time frame suggest Obama asked the FBI to put "the right people" on the Trump case and that Vice Presidemt Joe Biden may have suggested agents use the effectively obsolete Logan Act to investigate Flynn.

File
231.pdf

Jan. 6, 2017
Obama intelligence community agencies release report concluding that Russia attempted to meddle in the 2016 election in an effort to aid Donald Trump becoming president. Subsequent evidence would emerge calling into question that conclusion, including that Russian intelligence had been spreading false dirt trying to hurt Trump's reputation during and after the election.

File
ICAJan2017RussiaAssess.pdf

Jan. 9, 2017
Carter Page is recorded by FBI confidential informant Stefan Halper reacting to the BuzzFeed article, saying the information about him in the Steele dossier is "complete lies" and the dossier contains "false evidence against him." Page's protestations of innocence are never disclosed to the FISA court. Justice Department officials acknowledged around this time they also learned about a second intercept by Halper from October 2016 in which Page made significant statements of innocence that also were not disclosed to the judges, according to the DOJ inspector general report.

File
DOJ IG report on Russia FISAs

Jan. 10, 2017


Steele dossier is leaked to the American public in an article published by BuzzFeed, prompting concern inside the CIA, DNI and FBI that uncorroborated intelligence is now in the public domain.
Strzok, the lead agent, texts FBI lawyer Lisa Page that the leak of the Steele dossier in the news media could be used as a "pretext to go interview some people."
FISA court judge reviews draft of FISA warrant renewing surveillance on Carter Page and declared he had "no issue" with renewal, FBI email shows.
Jan. 11, 2017
FBI supervisory special agent writes email making clear he knows the firm that hired Steele to write the anti-Trump dossier was employed by the Democratic National Committee, according to IG report.


Jan. 12, 2017
The FBI receives a clear intelligence community warning that some of Steele's dossier information about Trump lawyer Michael Cohen was "part of a Russian disinformation campaign to denigrate U.S. foreign relations," according to a declassified footnote from the Justice Department inspector general's report.

File
04-15-20_ODNI_Declassified_Footnotes_20-00337_Unclassified.pdf

Comey writes outgoing Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper that the Steele dossier has not been verified sufficiently to have used in the intelligence community assessment on Russia meddling. "We are not able to sufficiently corroborate the reporting to include it in the body of the report," Comey concedes.

File
ComeyClapperMemo1-12-17.pdf

Comey signs a FISA warrant request extending surveillance of Carter Page for three more months, declaring the application's information from the Steele dossier was "verified," when in fact it was not. The court grants the surveillance warrant.

File
Carter-Page-FISA-Documents.FOIA-Release-1.pdf

Jan. 23, 2017
Senior Justice Department attorney Bruce Ohr, a friend of Steele, relayed new information to agents from the now-terminated informant, including that Steele had a previously undisclosed contact with Sen. John McCain's office about his dossier back in fall 2016 while he working for the bureau, a potential breach of his informant confidentiality. "Steele also told OHR that he spoke with a staff member of Senator John McCain's office sometime prior to October 2016. Steele had this conversation at the request of [name redacted]. Since October 2016, Steele had not spoken to anyone regarding the Trump dossier," the FBI's interview report of Ohr reported.

File
JW-v-DOJ-Ohr-302s-02107-1.pdf

Jan. 24, 2017
FBI interviews Gen. Michael Flynn despite concerns by some inside the DOJ it does not have a predicate and has not properly notified him or the Trump White House.
FBI Assistant Director William Priestap states in handwritten notes that there are concerns the bureau is "playing games" with Flynn. "What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" the senior FBI executive wrote.

File
FlynnFBINotes.pdf

FBI agents begin a three-day interview with Christopher Steele's primary sub-source, who casts significant doubt on the reliability of information in the dossier, including the sensational story that Russia possessed compromising evidence that Trump engaged with prostitutes at a Moscow hotel in 2013. "Primary sub-source said that he reported Trump's unorthodox sexual activity at the Ritz as rumor and speculation and that he had not been able to confirm the story," the FBI interview notes state.

[oldpioneer]

My single issue is the Constitution...it's what made America great...there is no other explanation. Without a constitution that defines what the Federal Government can not do, we would have been just like everybody else.

I find myself at odds with both parties...one more than the other, but they are both corrupted by power.

The framers definitely wrestled with the idea of a strong central government. And I can think of tons of examples were local/state. Control is a better option. But the constitution was also considered a living document. Don’t you think that a lot has changed since then? I mean when the framers wanted states to have control it was a three day horse ride to the Capitol. Now with technology and transportation and even illness traveling so fast don’t you think we need some sort of guidelines and regulations?

[MAL]

The framers definitely wrestled with the idea of a strong central government. And I can think of tons of examples were local/state. Control is a better option. But the constitution was also considered a living document. Don’t you think that a lot has changed since then? I mean when the framers wanted states to have control it was a three day horse ride to the Capitol. Now with technology and transportation and even illness traveling so fast don’t you think we need some sort of guidelines and regulations?

That is not a universally accepted constitutional theory. I tried to find who coined the phrase "the constitution is a living breathing document"...somebody tried to attribute it to Jefferson, but they never provided the quote. The article below said that the concept of a "living" Constitution has only been around for 50 years. The Constitution is obviously not alive...so now we have to examine what is meant by the phrase. In my opinion it can only "breathe" by using the amendment process. If "living" means that it can be loosely interpreted, then we don't even have a Constitution. For example when we bastardize the word welfare from the phrase in the preamble..."promote the general welfare" to mean that the federal Government can provide food stamps...then all we have to do is redefine the words in the Constitution to mean what we want them to mean. The Constitution itself is timeless, and must be interpreted according to original intent or it is meaningless. If you want a new regulation, the process is to have the elected members of Congress to pass a bill and have the President sign it...AND IT MUST PASS CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINEY. It is not ok to go around the Constitutional process to get what you want.

The Constitution is our protection against human nature...the accumulation of power is intoxicating. A lot has changed, but human nature, right and wrong have not changed. Centralized power is too dangerous to trust to any one group of humans. If one state legalized something that you found to be completely intolerable...wouldn't you want to have the option to move to 49 other states? 50 choices are 50 times better than one.

Scalia said it much better than I ever could.
https://blog.acton.org/archives/1016...o-america.html

The Living Constitution kills the actual Constitution — When judges abandon originalism and the original meaning to the text of the Constitution, it is merely a matter of time before the Constitution itself is abandoned.

In the long run, non-originalism triumphant and rampant is the death knell of the Constitution. As I suggested earlier, the whole purpose of the Constitution is to prevent a future society from doing whatsoever it wants to do. To change, to evolve, you don’t need a constitution. All you need is a legislature, as well as a ballot box. Things will change as fast as you want. You want to create new rights and/or destroy old ones? A legislature and the electoral franchise are all that you need. The only reason you need a constitution is because there are some things which you don’t want a majority to be able to change.

That’s my most important function as a judge in the American legal system. I have to tell the majority to take a hike. I tell them: “I don’t care what you want. The Bill of Rights says you cannot do it.”

Now, if there is no fixed absolute, if the Constitution evolves to mean what it ought to mean today, what makes you think the majority is going to leave it to judges to decide what the Constitution ought to mean? The people comprising the popular or legislative majority will do that only if they think the decisions of the courts will be supportive of their particular interests, values, and opinions. If there are no fixed legal standards, if the justices on the Supreme Court are supposed to tell us what are the evolving standards of decency that reflect a maturing society, a majority of the people and its political leadership will look for judges who agree with the majority as to what the Constitution means. And so we will have the absolutely crazy system in which we conduct a mini-plebiscite on the meaning of the Constitution every time we select a person to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court.