Release the Kraken

[MAL]

This Is Why the Democrats are So Afraid of a Valid Audit in Arizona

By Steven Ahle
It was unbelievable that Joe Biden did so well in Arizona considering the fact that he and Kamala Harris appeared at a campaign event in which they were unable to attract two dozen supporters. Between Labor Day and Election Day President Trump had 1.1 million people show up for his rallies while Joe Biden had less than 2,000. Yet, miraculously Biden got 81 million votes? You gotta be kidding me.

From The Gateway Pundit



While President Trump is bringing in record numbers to his rallies, Biden can’t buy an audience. In 2016 Hillary Clinton brought in musicians to increase attendance at her rallies. But Biden couldn’t even do that.

President Trump crushed Biden. He had more events even with his 10-day COVID quarantine in mid-October. Plus the President saw more than 560 times the number of supporters as Biden. (Candidate Trump had nine times the number of supporters at his rallies when compared to Crooked Hillary in 2016.)

So, what are the Democrats most afraid of? They are afraid that the people will see that the emperor is wearing no clothes. Not just in Arizona but throughout the swing states.

If Biden falls in Arizona, it will be easier to audit other states, and once enough states fall, even SCOTUS will not be able to ignore it. I’m just not convinced they would overturn the election. This current court has been a huge disappointment.

In 2016, President Trump drew nine times more people than Hillary, and in 2020 Trump drew over 500 times more people than Joe Biden, yet we are to believe he was the first Democrat to win Maricopa County in 72 years since Harry Truman pulled it off. The numbers just don’t seem to work out no matter how you add them up.


The total number of votes in Arizona in 2016 between Trump and Hillary was 2,413,568. There were a total number of votes between Trump and Biden of 3,333,829 votes. The number of votes increased in the state by 920,261 or nearly a million more votes. This was an increase of nearly 40% from 2016.

But somehow Biden, who couldn’t pay someone to come to his rally in Arizona, increased the number of votes over Hillary by 500,000 votes in the state or 44% more votes than Hillary. This would suggest that thousands of more people were excited about Joe Biden in Arizona when compared to Hillary Clinton.

There is simply no evidence to support this.

In Maricopa County, Biden won nearly 50% more votes than Hillary Clinton. Biden increased the number of votes from 2016 by 48%. What information supports this? Again, he couldn’t fill a parking lot less than a month before the audit.

[MAL]

State Of Georgia Busted For Taking Zuckerbucks To Sway Election

By Steven Ahle
In the 2020 election cycle, Mark Zuckerberg doled out money in swing states in an apparent appempt to influence the election, including $5 million that went to Brad Raffensperger.

Is it any wonder why Raffensperger acted as though he was working for the Democrats? Maybe it’s because he was. That seems to be an indisputable fact when you look at the nonprofit funding them.

Zuckerberg and his wife said they just wanted to help. With the country pounded by coronavirus and congressional talks at a standstill, the Facebook titan offered to chip in his own money to help keep the elections on track. Using a nonprofit, the Center for Technology and Civic Life, as a screen, the power couple started funneling hundreds of millions of dollars to local elections offices to help “[deal] with the difficulties of adapting to new voting behavior” during the pandemic.

In February Breitbart reported on this subject:

A report released by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society at a press conference on Wednesday alleged Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife made $419.5 million in contributions to non-profit organizations during the 2020 election cycle–$350 million to the “Safe Elections” Project of the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and another $69.5 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research–that, “improperly influence[d] the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party.”

$5.6 million dollars was given to Raffensperger’s office and allegedly it was spent mostly on two items. Making it easier to vote by mail and to fight misinformation.

In liberal speak, misinformation is facts that disagree with liberal ideology. And of course, voting by mail without signature verification is the easiest way to cheat. Georgia law says signatures must be verified but the law was illegally overridden by Raffensperger.


According to the Georgia Star, Raffensperger issued a press release on this but we don’t know when because it wasn’t dated:

Raffensperger announced the partnership with CEIR in a press release. The press release is undated. Members of Raffensperger’s staff presumably published it last year. In that press release, Raffensperger praised the CEIR staff as “the greatest minds that the country has to offer” and, because of that, he said Georgia could have a secure and reliable paper-ballot system.

[MAL]

International Auditing Expert SHOCKED at Nevada Sec. of State’s Flimsy Investigation of Obvious Election Fraud

BYMATTHEW HOLLOWAY
APRIL 25, 2021

The Nevada Secretary of State, Republican Barbara Cegavske has drawn the stern rebuke from her own party and shocked an international auditing expert by claiming after a flimsy investigation that there is no evidentiary support that there was widespread voter fraud in her state.

Earlier this month Secretary Cegavske was censured by the Nevada GOP for “disregard of her oath of office by failing to investigate election fraud, her dismissive public statements regarding election integrity concerns, and her failure to ensure compliance with Nevada and federal election law, these actions being at least partially causal in November 2020 election irregularities and fraud.”
The Flimsy Investigation


According to reports, Cegavske’s team was given data on over 122,000 suspected instances of voter fraud, of those approximately 40,000 were suspected duplicate votes which she rather flippantly responded to “…there are a number of alleged “double voters” who merely live on the same street as someone else born in the same year. As such, these additional 18,314 allegations did not warrant further investigation.”.
Furthermore, the Secretary determined that some 15,000 requests to verify Nevada residency were “unreasonable” because “there are reasons why a Nevada–registered voter maypermanently or temporarily live out of state, including to attend college or to satisfy military orders.” as a result these 15,000 were simply not checked. Even more egregiously, as Steven Crowder’s team at Louder with Crowder exposed: some 8,842 “individuals were identified with commercial addresses” her team checked into 369 of them and then dropped the rest, some 8,473.

In a letter to the Nevada GOP Cegavske wrote,

“While the NVGOP raises policy concerns about the integrity of mail-in voting, automatic voterregistration, and same-day voter registration, these concerns do not amount to evidentiary support forthe contention that the 2020 general election was plagued by widespread voter fraud. “

Joe Hoft of Gateway Pundit wrote,

“Cegavske claims that her office performed ‘more than 125’ hours of work to go through over 122,000 instances of suspected voter fraud presented to her office. [Speaking from experience and having done hundreds of audits around the world] 125 hours is a very short amount of time dedicated to an audit. Most of the audits performed in the private sector average around 400 hours, so her work was very cursory in nature and she proves it in her written response.”

The Numbers Speak Volumes


Of the 122,000 instances of suspected voter fraud, 41,787 were deliberately skipped by the Nevada Secretary of State’s “Audit” which took less than a third of the time of a private industry standard audit which is considerably less detailed than would be required for a matter of such crucial importance as the election of the President of the United States.


For the record: Biden was awarded the state on a difference of 34,000 votes. We have no accounting of how many instances of voter fraud Cegavske’s office actually investigated out of the 122,000, but we know for certain that they conciously decided to skip 41,787 of them. The only rational course of action was an investigation of all 122,000 instances, justice demanded no less. As such, Cegavske and her office failed. Every state where discrepancies occurred must check thoroughly and investigate every instance and hand count every vote. Period.

[MAL]

I wonder why you haven't seen voter fraud? Biden doesn't want you to see it. They don't think you are smart enough to make up your own mind if you here the other side of the story.


California Officials, Biden-Linked Firm Coordinated With Big Tech to Censor Election Posts: Judicial Watch


BY ISABEL VAN BRUGEN

April 28, 2021 Updated: April 28, 2021


California officials colluded with Big Tech to censor social media posts in the United States during the 2020 presidential election, government watchdog group Judicial Watch announced Tuesday.

The findings come after Judicial Watch received 540 pages and a further four pages of documents from the office of the Secretary of State of California in response to an open records request, the group said.

It had filed the request after a December 2020 report surfaced revealing that California’s Office of Election Cybersecurity had surveilled and asked the social media giants to remove or flag as “misleading” at least two dozen messages.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that SKDKnickerbocker, a communications company linked to President Joe Biden’s election campaign, was involved in the censoring of speech during last year’s election period.

The company did this by sharing its “Misinformation Daily Briefings” with California officials, who then passed them on to social media giants Facebook, Twitter, and Google for dissemination, according to Judicial Watch.

“These new documents suggest a conspiracy against the First Amendment rights of Americans by the California Secretary of State, the Biden campaign operation, and Big Tech,” Fitton said.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, in Washington on Nov. 1, 2019. (Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times)
He added, “These documents blow up the big lie that Big Tech censorship is ‘private’—as the documents show collusion between a whole group of government officials in multiple states to suppress speech about election controversies.”

Jenna Dresner, senior public information officer for the Office of Election Cybersecurity, responded to the December report at the time saying that “we don’t take down posts, that is not our role to play.”

“We alert potential sources of misinformation to the social media companies and we let them make that call based on community standards they created,” Dresner said.

According to Judicial Watch, the documents it obtained show how officials pushed big tech companies to censor social media posts.

The Google and YouTube logos are seen at the entrance to the Google offices in Los Angeles, Calif., on Nov. 21, 2019. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)
Google’s YouTube was contacted directly by a state official to remove a Judicial Watch video on the platform on Sept. 24, last year, according to the group.

“YouTube seemed to respond by deleting the video on September 27, 2020,” Judicial Watch said.

In another instance, a Facebook user who implied having voted twice with multiple ballots had their post removed on Oct. 31, 2020. Other posts removed by social media giants included claims of voter fraud, receiving multiple ballots in the mail, and finding thousands of alleged unopened ballots in a dumpster.

Meanwhile, a Twitter post from Fitton that said “Mailing 51 million ballots to those who haven’t asked for increases risk of voter fraud of voter intimidation,” was flagged by SKDKnickerBocker as part of its “Misinformation Tracker.”

Washington-based SKDKnickerBocker said in a statement last November that it developed the Biden campaign’s vote-by-mail program in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.

The communications firm and California’s Office of Election Cybersecurity didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment by The Epoch Times.

Big Tech companies have drawn intense scrutiny for perceived political bias and alleged unbalanced moderation of users’ content. Critics say much of the companies’ moderation in the past year has unfairly targeted conservative speech and speech from individuals deemed to be supporters of former President Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, groups on the other side of the aisle have been taking issue with how social media companies are operating, claiming that the Silicon Valley companies have failed to adequately address misinformation that is being proliferated online.

Janita Kan contributed to this report.

[HuffHall]

I wonder why you haven't seen voter fraud? Biden doesn't want you to see it. They don't think you are smart enough to make up your own mind if you here the other side of the story.

This is rich, mal intimating other people aren't smart enough, the resident dingbat of this forum, oh the irony and it's "hear" Einstein not "here"

PS - There is no other side to the story, you've been lied to, all Non Trump boot lickers have come to that realization you tin foil hat wearing nut job

[dadudaman4]

As I said a long time ago on this forum, what's the big deal about investigating election results. If there is nothing there, then you move on. If there is something that indicates the potential for some type of malfeasance, it should be investigated. Liberals should be front and center in insisting that any questions about election integrity be answered. You have nothing to lose, and everything to gain if you are right that there was no fraud. I have always kept an open mind about questions regarding the election, figuring that the truth will eventually come out, if it hasn't already.

[HuffHall]

I have zero problem with it, investigate away, just show proof, yet to see any of that

[MAL]

I have zero problem with it, investigate away, just show proof, yet to see any of that

The are censoring anybody that tries to show you the proof. It this thread was on Facebook, it would be banned and removed. Sounds kind of un-American to me.

I could show you a video tape of a poll worker counting ballots after "counting had stopped" for the evening, and running them through the machines 3 times...and you wouldn't be able to see it...because I did show you that video...and I don't remember you even acknowledging that the video even existed...you didn't even say anything about it. I showed you a video of a van dropping off ballots after the deadline in Michigan, but somehow you couldn't see it...you are blind to anything you don't want to see.

[oldpioneer]

Sometime this week, live from the Four Seasons.....Heating and air company, Rudy is finally going to release the Cracken.

[HuffHall]

The are censoring anybody that tries to show you the proof. It this thread was on Facebook, it would be banned and removed. Sounds kind of un-American to me.

I could show you a video tape of a poll worker counting ballots after "counting had stopped" for the evening, and running them through the machines 3 times...and you wouldn't be able to see it...because I did show you that video...and I don't remember you even acknowledging that the video even existed...you didn't even say anything about it. I showed you a video of a van dropping off ballots after the deadline in Michigan, but somehow you couldn't see it...you are blind to anything you don't want to see.

Credible proof mal, you show your BS videos or articles you pull off of I wannablowtrump.com I've said it before I'll say it again seek help you f'n nut case. The sh!t you post is comical and only believed by likeminded Trump cultists

[HuffHall]

This Is Why the Democrats are So Afraid of a Valid Audit in Arizona

By Steven Ahle
It was unbelievable that Joe Biden did so well in Arizona considering the fact that he and Kamala Harris appeared at a campaign event in which they were unable to attract two dozen supporters. Between Labor Day and Election Day President Trump had 1.1 million people show up for his rallies while Joe Biden had less than 2,000. Yet, miraculously Biden got 81 million votes? You gotta be kidding me.

From The Gateway Pundit



While President Trump is bringing in record numbers to his rallies, Biden can’t buy an audience. In 2016 Hillary Clinton brought in musicians to increase attendance at her rallies. But Biden couldn’t even do that.

President Trump crushed Biden. He had more events even with his 10-day COVID quarantine in mid-October. Plus the President saw more than 560 times the number of supporters as Biden. (Candidate Trump had nine times the number of supporters at his rallies when compared to Crooked Hillary in 2016.)

So, what are the Democrats most afraid of? They are afraid that the people will see that the emperor is wearing no clothes. Not just in Arizona but throughout the swing states.

If Biden falls in Arizona, it will be easier to audit other states, and once enough states fall, even SCOTUS will not be able to ignore it. I’m just not convinced they would overturn the election. This current court has been a huge disappointment.

In 2016, President Trump drew nine times more people than Hillary, and in 2020 Trump drew over 500 times more people than Joe Biden, yet we are to believe he was the first Democrat to win Maricopa County in 72 years since Harry Truman pulled it off. The numbers just don’t seem to work out no matter how you add them up.


The total number of votes in Arizona in 2016 between Trump and Hillary was 2,413,568. There were a total number of votes between Trump and Biden of 3,333,829 votes. The number of votes increased in the state by 920,261 or nearly a million more votes. This was an increase of nearly 40% from 2016.

But somehow Biden, who couldn’t pay someone to come to his rally in Arizona, increased the number of votes over Hillary by 500,000 votes in the state or 44% more votes than Hillary. This would suggest that thousands of more people were excited about Joe Biden in Arizona when compared to Hillary Clinton.

There is simply no evidence to support this.

In Maricopa County, Biden won nearly 50% more votes than Hillary Clinton. Biden increased the number of votes from 2016 by 48%. What information supports this? Again, he couldn’t fill a parking lot less than a month before the audit.

Hey mal stick that AZ audit right up you arse, it's a complete sham. My favorite part is when he directly answers your question

"People keep saying what are we afraid of? We’re not afraid of anything, if we were afraid of anything we wouldn't have hired two independent auditors."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/antifa-fe...165252876.html

You're such a clown it's comical at this point

[HuffHall]

LOL and this is where mal the magnificent gets his info from and yet whines about the left wing news media and pretends it doesn't go both ways, that's why no one take you seriously old man

https://www.yahoo.com/news/newsmax-s...215114923.html

[oldpioneer]

Half, I saw a mal on Jimmy Kimmel the other night

[HuffHall]

Was he part of the Pillow Guys entourage?

[MAL]

Hey mal stick that AZ audit right up you arse, it's a complete sham. My favorite part is when he directly answers your question

"People keep saying what are we afraid of? We’re not afraid of anything, if we were afraid of anything we wouldn't have hired two independent auditors."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/antifa-fe...165252876.html

You're such a clown it's comical at this point

Yahoo isn't even a serious news organization.

They didn't perform even one audit. They hired a company with ties to Dominion to check the performance of the machines...they were logic and accuracy tests...they didn't even look for fraud...they were handed a list of provable or disprovable fraudulent votes. Hobbs just dismissed them without even looking at them.

Part of what they are doing in this audit is called kinematic scanning. The process was invented by Jovan Pulitzer. They can tell if the ballots were mailed, how many times they have been touched, if they were filled out by hand or machine, where the paper was made, what ink was used to print them and much more...but that is not all they are doing, they are doing a second door to door canvas of voters...they will also look at the machines. If they don't find fraud they didn't want to find fraud.

Dems have been fighting world war 3 to stop this audit...I am surprised that they haven't succeeded. What are they afraid of?