Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Release the Kraken

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MAL
    replied
    FLASHBACK: IT and Data Experts Identified Material Fraud in the 2020 Election in Georgia Where 30,000 Votes were Removed from President Trump Yet Raffensperger Certified These Fraudulent Results for Biden by 12,000 Votes Anyways

    By Joe Hoft
    Published July 17, 2022


    Data experts from the Data Integrity Group identified material fraud in the 2020 Election in Georgia that would have given President Trump the lead in the state. However, this was ignored by Secretary of State Raffensperger who certified the state for Biden anyways.

    Looking back at a presentation to the Georgia Senate on December 30, 2020, a group of Data experts from the Data Integrity Group identified fraud that resulted in President Biden stealing the election in the state. The state ignored this fraud and certified the election anyways.

    Lynda McLaughlin from the Data Integrity Group, along with data scientists Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue, presented their results before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections.

    Justin Mealey Mealey worked as an electronic warfare technician in the U.S. Navy for nine and a half years and was a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractor as a data analyst and programmer for the National Counterterrorism Center. He currently works for one of the “Big Four” accounting firms as a programmer.


    Dave Lobue is a data scientist with over a decade of experience in a number of industries.

    “What we have here is we actually have fraud that we can prove in this election, there was fraud in Georgia’s election, we can prove it with data,” Justin Mealey said. “The voting will of the people of Georgia is not reflected in what was certified by the Secretary of State.”

    Dave Lobue shared the following in his presentation:
    We objectively focused on numbers, data, and machine network systems. Based on our extensive analysis against precinct, county and state voting results we’ve identified over 40 data points where negative voting, and outright vote switching across candidates has totalled over 200,000 votes. Separately we’ve applied machine learning algoriths that are regularly used for anomoly detection of fraud and financial services that flagged over 500 precincts with over one million corresponding votes that exhibited suspicous activity.

    The data analysts then went on to claim that for a candidate to receive 75% or more of all the votes in a precinct is abnormal. Receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud. Then the experts provided a chart showing that in Fulton County, Georgia alone there were 51 precincts with 90-93% of the ballots for Joe Biden, 51 precincts with 94% of the ballots for Joe Biden, 36 precincts with 95% of the ballots for Joe Biden and another 36 precincts with 96 to 100% of the ballots for Joe Biden. Overall, over 150 precincts in Fulton County voted 90% plus for Biden which was over 152,000 Biden votes. This was clearly suspicious or outright fraudulent activity.

    The data experts next presented data on DeKalb County. In 94 precincts Biden received 90% or more of the vote. Again, this was suspicious or fraudulent activity.

    Then the experts discussed Dodge County where 7,008 votes were removed from President Trump’s vote totals. In Putnam County where 5,935 votes were removed from President Trump’s totals and Dougherty County 17,650 votes were removed from President Trump. In total in these counties, President Trump had over 30,000 votes disappear.


    These same analysts show that in Fulton County there were 12,173 ballots that were switched from Trump to Biden. Combined with the votes that disappeared, there are more than 50,000 Trump votes that were eliminated from the certified results in Georgia – more than enough for Trump to win the election in Georgia.

    Next, the analysts talk about how your vote eventually makes it to the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets. After you check in at a poll pad, you make your choices and then cast your vote and a ballot image is created on your machine. When the polls close SD cards containing all the ballot images are removed from the terminals and transported by car to a drop-off location. Then they are transferred by police escort to an election warehouse.

    Inside the warehouse, the SD cards are run through tabulation software like Dominion’s Democracy Suite. The ballots are counted at this time and forwarded to a Dominion server that inserts those totals into a SQL server database. From that point, it’s directly transmitted to the SCTYL election night reporting server. This server transmits the totals to the secretary of state and data aggregators like Edison for reporting to the mainstream media.

    In the data entry process for county updates, the following options are available to anyone with access to these computers working with election software as noted in the middle box in the diagram below. These users can create new batches, reject batches, validate batches and validate and publish batches. Anyone with access to the system at this point can manipulate and create large batches of votes.

    The experts in Georgia used the SCYTL source data and the New York Times Edison data as noted in the chart below.


    There is no manual interface in the process involved above because data is moved between machines and accumulated, it’s not manually tabulated by individuals. Therefore the data showing the 50,000 ballots netted from President Trump was done through the machines. At no point in this process should President Trump’s votes be reduced. This is an incremental process and not a decremental one. To date, there has been no rationale for why all these ballots were reduced from President Trump.

    Finally, for the ballots that were adjudicated, the original image is deleted and replaced with the new image. The original image is gone forever. Therefore the ballot recount didn’t include the original ballot images that were previously destroyed. Also, from an audit perspective, we have no idea who made the changes and created the new images.

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Originally posted by oldpioneer View Post
    If Mall was given a multiple-choice test and the question was in which ways was the election rigged? He would bubble in “all of the above” without reading the questions or the answers! Lol
    You are close, I would read and write an essay about each answer before checking all of the above.

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Originally posted by HuffHall View Post
    Conservatives have had enough with the big lie

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tr...?siteid=yhoof2
    That fake news story has been debunked by a genius inventor. We can both offer debunking the debunker articles if you are not interested in substance...but Jovan actually has substance.


    https://jovanhuttonpulitzer.locals.c...eport-rebuttal

    Leave a comment:


  • oldpioneer
    replied
    If Mall was given a multiple-choice test and the question was in which ways was the election rigged? He would bubble in “all of the above” without reading the questions or the answers! Lol

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election


    There are now nearly two dozen credible confirmations of wrongdoing, irregularities and illegalities that undercut the claims of bureaucrats, journalists and Democrats that the November 2020 general election was flawless.

    0:05 / 1:05By John Solomon
    Updated: July 16, 2022

    Democrats and their allies in the traditional news media have coined the term the "Big Lie" to dismiss anyone who questions the conduct of the 2020 election.

    But with each passing day, new irregularities, security vulnerabilities and illegalities are being unmasked by bombshell revelations from courts, legislators and other investigative bodies like the FBI and Homeland Security Department.

    The latest came last week when the Wisconsin Supreme Court declared that state election regulators had no legal authority to allow voters to cast ballots in mobile drop boxes, a jaw-dropping decision that invalidated the way tens of thousands of voters -- many of them Democrats -- cast their ballots,

    From Phoenix to Detroit, and Madison to Austin, there are now nearly two dozen credible confirmations of problems that undercut the claims of bureaucrats, journalists and Democrats that the November 2020 general election was perfect. In fact, it was quite imperfect.

    And while none of revelations, at this point, have persuaded courts to reverse the outcome of the presidential tally or unseat Joe Biden from the White House, they have shaken voter confidence in key battleground states and built a compelling case that the bigger lie was that the 2020 election was flawless.

    Here are 21 important revelations uncovered by Just the News over the last 18 months of reporting, complete with substantiating evidence and links:
    1. Illegal ballot drop boxes. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled earlier this month that the 570 drop boxes used during the 2020 election were unlawfully approved by the Wisconsin Election Commission, "Only the legislature may permit absentee voting via ballot drop boxes," the court declared. "WEC cannot. Ballot drop boxes appear nowhere in the detailed statutory system for absentee voting. WEC's authorization of ballot drop boxes was unlawful." State Rep. Janel Brandtjen told Just the News that hundreds of thousands of votes were cast in the illegal boxes in the 2020 race when Biden and Donald Trump were separated by less than 21,000 votes.
    2. A Foreign Intrusion. Federal authorities have confirmed that two Iranian nationals successfully hacked into a state computer election system, stole 100,000 voter registrations and used the data to carry out a cyber-intimidation campaign that targeted GOP members of Congress, Trump campaign officials and Democratic voters in the November 2020 election in one of the largest foreign intrusions in U.S. election history. The defendants "were part of a coordinated conspiracy in which Iranian hackers sought to undermine faith and confidence in the U.S. presidential election," U.S. Attorney Damian Williams declared in an indictment.
    3. The Laptop Lie: More than 50 national security experts, countless news organizations and large social media firms falsely told American voters in fall 2020 that the Hunter Biden laptop with damning revelations about Biden family corruption was Russian disinformation. In fact, it was a legitimate laptop already in the FBI's possession, and Hunter Biden was already under criminal investigation before voters cast their 2020 ballots. The false narrative had significant impact: polling shows a majority of American voters believe the pre-election censorship of the story amounted to election interference,
    4. Alleged Bribery. The former state Supreme Court justice appointed by the Wisconsin Legislature to investigate the 2020 election concluded that millions of dollars in donations to election administrators in five Democrat-heavy municipalities from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life violated state anti-bribery laws and corrupted election practices by turning public election authorities into liberal get-out-the-vote activists. “The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL/ Zuckerberg 5 scheme would prove to be an effective way to accomplish the partisan effort to 'turnout' their desired voters and it was done with the active support of the very people and the governmental institution (WEC) that were supposed to be guarding the Wisconsin elections administrative process from the partisan activities they facilitated,” Justice Michael Gableman wrote.
    5. Illegal ballot harvesting in Wisconsin. Gableman also exposed an extensive vote collection operation, known as ballot harvesting, in nursing homes in which third-party activists illegally collected the ballots of vulnerable residents, some of whom lacked the mental or physical capacity to vote or were forbidden from voting by guardianship agreements. State election regulators “unlawfully directed the municipal clerks not to send out the legally required special voting deputies to nursing homes, resulting in many nursing homes’ registered residents voting at 100% rates and many ineligible residents voting, despite a guardianship order or incapacity,” Gableman wrote in his explosive report.
    6. Ballot harvesting probe in the Peach State. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has announced he has opened a criminal investigation into allegations that liberal activists engaged in illegal ballot harvesting, collecting ballots from voters and delivering them in violation of state law. Raffensperger said he is planning to issue subpoenas to identify a whistleblower who admitted he engaged in the operation, and there could be prosecutions. The True the Vote election integrity group says in a formal state complaint that the man, identified as John Doe, admitted his role and identified nonprofits who funded it at $10 per ballot delivered. The watchdog group also claims it has assembled cell phone location records pinpointing the alleged harvesting by as many as 240 activists.
    7. Bad voter signatures? A review of Maricopa County's mail-in ballots in Arizona's 2020 presidential election estimated that more than 200,000 ballots with signatures that did not match voter files were counted without being reviewed, more than eight times the number the county acknowledged.
    8. 50,000 Arizona ballots called into question. An extensive audit by Arizona’s Senate officially called into question more than 50,000 ballots cast in the 2020 election, including voters who cast ballots from residences they had left. The tally in question is nearly five times the margin of Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
    9. Foreign voters found on Texas rolls. An audit of Texas voter rolls identified nearly 12,000 noncitizens suspected of illegally registering to vote and nearly 600 cases in which ballots may have been cast in the name of a dead resident or by a voter who may also have voted in another state. Officials are now in the process of removing the foreign voters and deciding whether prosecutions are warranted.
    10. Foreign voters found on Georgia rolls. An audit by Georgia’s Secretary of State has identified more than 2,000 suspected foreigners who tried to register to vote in the state, though none reached the point of casting ballots. Raffensperger says prosecutions may be forthcoming.
    11. More noncitizen voters. The Gableman investigation in Wisconsin also found noncitizens had made it onto the state voters rolls in violation of state law. The Wisconsin Election Commission failed “to record non-citizens in the WisVote voter database, thereby permitting non-citizens to vote, even though Wisconsin law requires citizenship to vote — all in violation of the Help America Vote Act,” the investigator wrote.
    12. Election Machine Vulnerabilities: Immediately after the November 2020 elections, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security agency declared there was no hacking or machine vulnerabilities. The Iran hacking case put the lie to the first claim. And last month, the Homeland Security agency admitted in a new report that the popular Dominion Democracy Suite ImageCast X voting system had nine vulnerabilities, most of which include the ability to "install malicious code" on the machines. Federal officials say they don't know of any efforts to exploit those vulnerabilities in 2020, but the reversal in stories has significantly shaken confidence in the bureaucracy's assurances.
    13. Ballot chain of custody issues. The Georgia Secretary of State's office has opened an investigation into the handling of drop box ballots last November in one of the state's Democratic strongholds following a media report that there were problems with chain of custody documentation in DeKalb County.
    14. Fulton County irregularities. Georgia’s handpicked election monitor for Fulton County, the state’s largest voting district, documented two dozen pages of mismanagement and irregularities during vote counting in Atlanta in November 2020, including double-scanning of ballots, insecure transport of ballots and violations of voter privacy. The revelations prompted the state to take steps to possibly put Fulton County in receivership, empowering state officials to run the elections. Most of Fulton County's election officials have left their jobs.
    15. Errant vote counting. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp referred the audited November 2020 election results in Fulton County to the State Election Board after multiple reviews found three dozen significant problems with absentee ballot counting, including duplicate tallies, math errors and transposed data. Kemp’s referral calls into question hundreds of ballots in the official count.
    16. Dirty voter rolls. Michigan’s official state auditor has found that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson failed to adhere to state election law by properly updating and reconciling Michigan’s qualified voter roll. This oversight, according to the audit, increased the risk of ineligible voters casting ballots.
    17. Illegal exemptions from voter ID. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled as many as 200,000 voters were allowed to illegally skip voter ID for absentee ballots by claiming they were indefinitely confined by COVID when there was no such legal authority to do so. Biden beat Trump by about 20,000 votes in the state.
    18. Uneven enforcement of election laws. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified more than 30 problems with the administration of elections in 2020, including unlawful orders and uneven enforcement of the law and urged lawmakers to make sweeping improvements.
    19. More illegal harvesting. In Arizona, a half dozen people have already been indicted on charges of illegal harvesting in a probe by Attorney General Mark Brnovich that shows signs of expanding. It comes after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Democrats' arguments and concluded Arizona’s ban on harvesting was constitutional.
    20. Voter fraud in Michigan. Michigan charged three women in connection with voter fraud schemes, including efforts to cast ballots on behalf of non-consenting nursing home residents.
    21. Still more nursing home fraud. In Wisconsin, Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling announced his investigators have secured evidence that eight out of 42 residents at a local nursing home had been recorded as casting absentee ballots that their families said was not possible because the residents didn't possess the cognitive ability to vote.

    Here is a required reading list for anyone interested in the above issues:

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling Invalidating Ballot Drop Boxes
    File
    WISupremeCourtDecisionBallotDropBoxes.pdf




    The Gableman Report
    File
    GablemanReport.pdf




    The CISA Dominion Voting Machines Vulnerabilities Reports
    File
    CISA Dominion Machine Vulnerabilties Report.pdf




    Iranian Hackers Indictment
    File
    IranianHackerVoterDatabaseIndictment.pdf




    Georgia state memo on irregularities in Fulton County vote counting
    File
    FultonCountyIrregularitiesMemo.pdf




    Kemp referral on erroneous vote counting
    File
    Review of Inconsistencies in the Data Supporting the Risk Limiting Audit Report.pdf




    Georgia Ballot Harvesting Complaint
    File
    120121_Complaint_Trafficking_General_and_Run-Off___4_ (1).pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    There is another side to the j6 story. It is a short video.

    https://rumble.com/v1ck67z-capitol-p...&mc=dgip3&ep=2

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Griswold and Republicans Aligned: Obstruct Election Challenges and Prohibit Transparency
    asheinamerica

    Jul 14
    JULY 14, 2022 – MESA COUNTY, CO. On Thursday morning, Judge Matthew D. Barrett of Colorado’s 21st Judicial District issued an arrest warrant for Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters. He also revoked her $25,000 cash bond and called for her to be held in jail pending a hearing. Peters is facing multiple indictments for the actions she took to preserve election evidence last spring.

    Earlier this week, on July 12, Peters spoke at a Nevada event hosted by the Constitutional Sheriff and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA). Peters discussed the asymmetrical treatment she has received from the Colorado justice system, affirmed that she has not conceded from her race, and delivered a scathing rebuke of Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (CD3). A spokesperson for Congresswoman Boebert denied all allegations.

    District Attorney Dan Rubenstein, the Mesa County DA investigating Peters, said that her request for travel was denied by the court. Counsel for Peters, a Gold Star Mother and cancer survivor, says the issue was a clerical error. The judge sided with the state and it appears for now that they are going to put Clerk Peters back in jail.

    The ongoing political persecution of Peters is tyrannical and unjust – just a couple years ago it would have been unthinkable for a sitting elected official to treat their political opponent in a reelection campaign in the manner that Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold has treated Clerk Peters.

    The New York Times led the dishonest legacy media on this story, and it’s clear that this is simply the latest attempt by Griswold and the establishment to distract from the fraud-ridden Colorado Primary Election on June 28.
    Statistically Impossible Results


    In the two weeks since the primary, clerks and commissioners are hearing calls for decertification and forensic audits across most, if not all, Colorado counties, and they are coming from candidates regardless of which race, from US Senator to County Coroner.

    Griswold needs a distraction and she needs one fast.

    The outrage began the moment that election night reporting data dropped from Edison research via AP News. According to Edison, ALL competitive Colorado Republican races show a controlled system that maintains the margin of victory for the selected candidates throughout election night. The results show the same evidence of a controlled system regardless of how you filter the data; in other words, the manipulation shows at the county AND state levels. This is not statistically improbable. It’s impossible.

    Edison reporting data doesn’t extend to local races in Colorado, so the only way for county and city races to be evaluated is to get the Cast Vote Record from the clerk. El Paso County Republican Chair Vickie Tonkins requested this record from Clerk Chuck Broerman earlier this week. Clerk Broerman responded that she could obtain the record in September, long after the deadlines for challenge. This is absolute despotism on full display by the uniparty Republicans, many of them incumbents who are obstructing transparency into their own reelection campaigns!
    The Cover Up is Always Worse


    They have to obstruct. The only reason that has been provided by the wholly corrupted and illegitimate government in Denver – and their preferred election outsourcing provider Dominion – is that all of us just don’t understand.

    Batches of ballots are reported at intervals. As each candidate gains votes from each batch, the lines go up (number of votes) and to the right (over time). Sometimes in these graphs, as in Garfield County, the lines go down. It’s unclear why candidates are losing votes that were already tabulated. If you ask this question, you’re an “election denier.”

    The only answer provided to the hundreds of data, engineering, cyber, math, and other domain specialists that have been asking, is that they are getting this wrong because it’s election data. They don’t understand what happens inside the machines — and no one does because the source code is proprietary and forbidden — and so they aren’t election experts.
    Nowhere to Run


    They have to obstruct because they are faced with damning evidence – from the same data used by the media to officially report results that we are not allowed to question. This damning evidence proves that our elections are predetermined selections and the entire process is an exercise in uniparty theater.

    Welcome to the complexity of modern elections. The only election experts that are acceptable are the vendors. Per the Colorado Election Security Act (SB22-153) that Griswold just put in place, only her people are allowed to become election experts, and thus gain access to the magical knowledge that reveals the secrets of how they tabulate our votes in a way that looks like fraud but totally isn’t fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    [QUOTE=HuffHall;n908622]Conservatives have had enough with the big lie

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tr...?siteid=yhoof2[/QUOTE


    I read most of the 72 page report. It is well written, but it lacks any substance. It's full of "that was debunked" "that has been refuted" "they found no evidence" "the false claims"...there is nothing but, boilerplate responses to legitimate claims of fraud.

    We have not had our day in court and it appears that we will not get it. Almost all cases have been dismissed claiming the we have no standing or latches or other procedural grounds.

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Originally posted by HuffHall View Post
    Conservatives have had enough with the big lie

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tr...?siteid=yhoof2
    There are plenty of establishment types that don't want Trump to run, but buried in your article is a link to what Republican voters think.

    "Asked whether they would like to see Trump run for president in 2024, Republicans say 66 - 30 percent they would. "

    https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3810


    Leave a comment:


  • HuffHall
    replied
    Conservatives have had enough with the big lie

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tr...?siteid=yhoof2

    Leave a comment:


  • HuffHall
    replied
    Originally posted by MAL View Post

    That's not the question that the poll asked. Question number 12 is (If voting in the Republican primary) If the Republican 2024 presidential primary were held today, who would you vote for if the candidates were:

    That is a lot different than asking: Do you want Trump to run in 2024? If Trump is the nominee he will get 90+ percent support from Republicans and he is gaining support from Democrats and minorities. White college indoctrinated women are the only group that Trump is not making inroads with.


    On the other hand there is a poll that askes Democrats if they want Joe to run.

    "64% of Democrats don't want Biden to run for a 2nd term in 2024, NYT poll shows"

    https://www.businessinsider.com/64-o...ll-2022-7?op=1

    I think we can agree no one outside the Biden family wants him to run again

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    81 million votes...yea right...I don't think so. "Lets go Brandon"



    CNN Savages Biden's Disapproval Rating: 'Worst Ever' at This Point in 1st Term


    By Bradley Cortright July 14, 2022

    WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 12: U.S. President Joe Biden hosts the Congressional Picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 12, 2022 in Washington, DC. An annual opportunity for members of Congress and their families to visit administration officials and others for non-partisan fellowship and entertainment, the picnic was cancelled in 2020 and 2021 due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)In 2020, President Joe Biden set a record as the presidential candidate to receive the most votes ever in U.S. history.

    And now, over a year and a half into this first term, he is setting a new record but it’s probably one he won’t be bragging about: how high his disapproval rating is at this point in his presidency.

    CNN’s senior data reporter, Harry Enten, made an appearance on “AC 360” to discuss the president’s abysmal approval rating with host Anderson Cooper.


    Enten shared a slide that showed Biden’s disapproval rating seven months ago was at 50% and a year ago it was at 44%. Now, it is at 58%.

    At the same time, a year ago, polls showed that just 5% of Americans listed inflation as a top family concern, and seventh months ago 14% said the same. However, today that number is at 33%.


    “A year ago, no one was saying inflation was a concern outside of [economist Larry Summers]. Now, it is a clear number one issue, and we see this clear correlation as more people are concerned about inflation, Joe Biden’s disapproval rating climbs ever higher,” he said.







    Cooper then asked how Biden’s approval rating compares to previous presidents, and this is where the segment took a detour to perhaps inadvertently savage the current occupant of the White House’s poll numbers.

    Do you think Biden's approval rating can go lower?Yes No

    Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
    “We can look at both Joe Biden’s disapproval rating on inflation and Joe Biden’s disapproval rating overall, and what we see is his disapproval rating on inflation is topping 70%. His disapproval rating overall is still in the 50s,” Enten said.

    On the screen was displayed a slide that read, “Worst ever at this point in 1st term in presidential polling history.”

    He went on:
    “But, if you compare that to every single other president at this point in their first term throughout polling history, this goes all the way back since the 1940s, he is the worst on both.”

    Finally, Enten said, “The reason he is worst overall is because inflation is eating his presidency alive at this point.”

    Related:
    Watch: Biden Delivers Incredibly Childish Answer When Asked How Long the War in Ukraine Could Last
    According to FiveThirtyEight, Biden’s average approval rating is sitting at 38.8% while his disapproval rating is 56%.

    His approval rating is lower than all of his 12 immediate predecessors.


    Biden is reportedly very upset with his poll numbers. But he seems to be only able to do things that keep making people like him less.

    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Originally posted by HuffHall View Post

    The point of the poll was over 1/2 the republicans dont want him running again, carry on
    That's not the question that the poll asked. Question number 12 is (If voting in the Republican primary) If the Republican 2024 presidential primary were held today, who would you vote for if the candidates were:

    That is a lot different than asking: Do you want Trump to run in 2024? If Trump is the nominee he will get 90+ percent support from Republicans and he is gaining support from Democrats and minorities. White college indoctrinated women are the only group that Trump is not making inroads with.


    On the other hand there is a poll that askes Democrats if they want Joe to run.

    "64% of Democrats don't want Biden to run for a 2nd term in 2024, NYT poll shows"

    https://www.businessinsider.com/64-o...ll-2022-7?op=1


    Leave a comment:


  • MAL
    replied
    Breaking: Tina Peters Challenges Colorado’s Unbelievable GOP Primary Election Results — Where No-Name Candidate with Zuckerberg’s CTCL Came out of Nowhere, Made Up 35 Vote Deficit, and Won Primary


    Original article. More evidence that they continue to steal elections.
    By Jim Hoft
    Published July 13, 2022



    On Tuesday, July 1, a no-name political operative who sits on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) won the Republican primary Secretary of State race in Colorado.

    Popular conservative and MAGA candidate Tina Peters was leading in the polls and had a 15 point lead on her closest competitor Pam Anderson before the votes were counted.

    But Pam Anderson from Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life and defeated Peters by 20 points.

    It was another Raffensperger Special!

    Anderson came back from 15 points down to win by 20 points over Tina Peters.
    It was a miracle!

    Two days later investigative reporter Emerald Robinson discussed the truly unbelievable primary results.

    The story of the GOP primary race for Secretary of State in Colorado gets more interesting the more you investigate the results.



    As I noted yesterday, the big news is that an Australian businessman named Mike O’Donnell somehow got 28% of the vote (173,000 citizens voted for him!) even though polling showed he had no support, he raised $4,700 for his campaign, and 139 people were following his campaign on Twitter. The most interaction he got on his 1,300 campaign tweets was 4 “likes” on his June 27th tweet; most of them had zero interaction. He went from being a non-factor in a three-person race to grabbing more than quarter of the total vote.
    Mike O’Donnell seems like a very nice guy — but can anyone explain his sudden 28% share of the vote in the most important election integrity race in Colorado? Election officials in Colorado had no explanation. Most of the county clerks in the 17 counties that Mike O’Donnell won had never heard of him. Their reactions ranged from confusion to disbelief…

    …The really big news is that Pam Anderson supposedly won the race with 43% of the vote (266,000 citizens voted for her!) which is an unbelievable result — to say the very least.

    It’s truly unbelievable because two months before the primary, Pam Anderson was not just losing to Tina Peters in all the polling and fundraising metrics, but her campaign was broke. She had a $5,665 balance in her campaign coffers. According to liberal site Colorado Pols, “this surprisingly anemic fundraising is just more evidence that [Pam Anderson] is a candidate without a constituency…”

    Two days after that assessment, Colorado Pols considered Anderson’s campaign dead-on-arrival and added that: “Peters’ strong performance further underscores Anderson’s weakness in this race, running on a message not just disagreed with but considered treasonous by a majority of Republican voters.”

    Furthermore, Tina Peters was the obvious frontrunner in every way:
    “In the Republican primary for Colorado Secretary of State, all the momentum now is with Tina Peters. By every available metric, Peters is the frontrunner. Peters dominated the vote at the state assembly, and now holds a commanding lead in fundraising. Peters is getting orders of magnitude more earned media attention. Coverage one might perceive as negative about Peters’ criminal case, at least until June 28th, is not a major liability with GOP primary voters. To the extent they’ve heard of Peters, a large percentage will see her as a hero.”
    So where were Pam Anderson’s 266,000 voters hiding all this time before primary day? You must remember that Tina Peters got 61% of the delegates at Colorado’s Republican Assembly in April. What about Pam Anderson — you ask?

    Pam Anderson did not even attend the Republican assembly. She was so unpopular in the Colorado GOP that she was a write-in candidate who only qualified in April. She had to collect 1,000 valid signatures from registered Republicans in each of the state’s eight congressional districts just to get on the ballot. In the 5th Congressional District, Anderson managed only 1,282 valid signatures. Apparently, more than 5,000 of the 17,904 signatures submitted by Anderson were not valid.

    In other words, Pam Anderson was not a wildly popular candidate among Republicans.

    So how did Pam Anderson suddenly pull off a miraculous 35 point swing on Primary Day two months later with no money and no endorsements?

    The only advantage that Pam Anderson had in this race: she’s on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia, the “Center For Tech And Civic Life.”

    Isn’t it strange that the director of Mark Zuckerberg’s private election charity for Democrats (on temporary leave!) just won the most important election integrity race in Colorado — anda GOP primary no less as a write-in candidate with a 35 point polling swing with no money and no visible support from Republicans?

    One more thing: Colorado uses Dominion Voting Machines.

    On Tuesday Tina Peters challenged the 2022 Colorado Republican Primary Results for Secretary of State.

    Tina Peters requested all Cast Vote Records (CVR), ballot dropbox records including video surveillance, all records pertaining to signature verification, all records and reports related to voter registration and voting history, and all electronic voting system logs specified in the 2002 Voting System Standards mandated by CRS Title 1, Article 5, Part 6 be provided to canvassing boards as part of the recount process pursuant to e.g. CRS $ 1-10.5-107.

    Leave a comment:


  • HuffHall
    replied
    Originally posted by MAL View Post

    You dip sh#t. Did you read past the headline? According to that poll, If the primary was held today Trump would get half of the Republican votes...double DeSantis's vote total, the second place finisher The media know that their readers are so stupid that they can fool them with a deceptive headline.
    The point of the poll was over 1/2 the republicans dont want him running again, carry on

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X