Release the Kraken

[MAL]

If you have 83.000 ballots go missing in a race that was won by 10,000 votes there is no way know what the accurate vote total is...you can't honestly certify the election for either candidate. Biden could have won by 93,000 votes or Trump could have won by 73,000 votes, or any where in between, but there is no possible way to certify the results.

Report: 83K Wisconsin 2020 Mail Ballots ‘Went Missing or Undeliverable’
, but there
Keely Sharp

September 6, 2021According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), there were 82,766 mail-in ballots sent out to Wisconsin voters in the 2020 presidential election that "went missing or undeliverable." Which is more than four times greater than the number of votes that Joe Biden allegedly won the state with, at a margin victory of 20,682 votes.

PILF reported on Friday, “83K mail ballots went missing or undeliverable amid 20k vote margin of victory in WI 2020 Presidential."

“We now know the cost of the rush to mail balloting – lost ballots. The federal data show the 2020 election had more mail ballots that were never counted than the margin of victory in the Presidential election in Wisconsin. This isn’t the way to run an election. Mail ballots invite error, disenfranchisement of voters, and puts the inept U.S. Post Office determining the outcome of elections,” said PILF President J. Christian Adams.

The report released elaborated:

Unlike other states its size with an influence in national politics, Wisconsin could brag about the fact that its counts of undeliverable and “unknown” mail ballots never inundated the margin of victory for a statewide candidate—until the 2020 Election. Expanded vote-by-mail efforts create stress tests on a state’s voter registration list maintenance system and reveal if investments in ballot chains of custody were effective.

“When Wisconsin loses track of more ballots than the difference between winning and losing its Electoral College votes, that is a core system failure,” they concluded.

I think most people realize by now that this election was fraudulently "won" by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Now we want justice for the time we have lost as they destroy the country.

[MAL]

Hey MAL, Oh I just want to tell you I thought of you pal. About once a week in the newspaper they identify another one of the January 6 traitors from Illinois. I also read they are subpoenaing Social media companies for posts and information. And now I know they are mainly looking at that parlor. I was on there man and they were just laying out the plan. I’m just waiting for them to say they have identified a John Doe who goes by the screen name MAL from a very obscure section of the website called Illinois Matmen!

Facebook had more January 6th planning than Parler...and Parler reported the activity to the FBI...but the FBI already knew about it...they were in leadership rolls in the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers...they were doing some planning of their own. Kinda like how they planned the Governor Whitmer kidnapping so they could frame some useful idiots for the crime.

They will never catch me.

[oldpioneer]

Facebook had more January 6th planning than Parler...and Parler reported the activity to the FBI...but the FBI already knew about it...they were in leadership rolls in the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers...they were doing some planning of their own. Kinda like how they planned the Governor Whitmer kidnapping so they could frame some useful idiots for the crime.

They will never catch me.

Are you priming for September 18?

[MAL]

It's not different though, it's the same exact thing except flip flopped. For 4 years if you would have exclusively read Fox or newsmax articles you woulda thought DT was the 2nd coming of George Washington. How do you keep harping like its just 1 side that's bias. Yes CNN/MSNBC and others are shills for the left and Fox and other are shills for the right, no side worse than the other just garbage journalism. When people stop being tribal and realize both sides are completely F'd up right now then we might actually be able to start fixing things. If we continue with my side is right I'm the patriot the other side is evil and hates America then we'll continue to wallow in the muck and our enemies will just sit back and wait for us to destroy ourselves

Bias in the news is one thing...but when has FOX ever knowingly lied in an attempt to frame a President for treason? Everybody knew from the very beginning that the story was fake...the media knew...the FBI knew...Hillary knew...everybody involved knew right from the start that there was absolutely no truth in the Steel Dossier, but they all pushed the lie for 4 years. Where is the Fox fake news equivalent to that monstrosity? In the end it was Hillary that paid a foreigner to interfere in the election...she is the one that colluded with someone with ties to Putin. Where the F is your outrage? It's like Russian collusion to interfere in the election is all good if Russia is on your side. You can't possibly think that Fox's political spin is the same thing as framing a president and his staff.

[MAL]

Are you priming for September 18?

I haven't lost my prime, so I don't need to re-prime yet. What's happening on the 18th? Big tech has done a damn good job of wiping out most of my sources. You have no idea how bad the censorship is.

[MAL]

Here is a fact based video on the origin of Covid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djkYNN-wuvQ

[oldpioneer]

They haven’t wiped out the Chicago tribune yet. The Illini football team lost to a team that’s only had a football program for 10 years prior. You are going to have to pony up a dollar though because it’s not free like all that other crap on the Internet. There was an article about you and your boys heading to DC again I thought it was September 18 maybe it’s October 18…Don’t worry about Covid it’s just like the flu. Remember? Scroll back about 300 cut and pasted Articles of non sense. You are quite clear about that.Remember? People didn’t die of Covid they just died because we were diabetic and little things like that. I will look for the article about the 18th. They were talking about putting those fences back up. But of course they were just some good old white American patriots on a field trip remember? You know you should do is go to a used music store you could pick up an old snare real cheap and you could be like that drummer you see and all those pictures of the revolution of 1776!

[oldpioneer]

Here I cut and pasted it for youhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/proud-boys-oath-keepers-extremist-rally-september-18-washington-d-c/

[MAL]

This should clear up just about all doubt about the origins of Covid and Fauci's roll in funding gain of function research with US tax dollars. The article neglects to mention that in 2012 Fauci argued in favor of gain of function research even if it could cause a world wide pandemic.

Newly Released Documents Detail US-Funded Coronavirus Research at Wuhan Institute of Virology: Report


BY KATABELLA ROBERTS

September 7, 2021 Updated: September 7, 2021
biggersmaller
Print
New documents have been released detailing U.S.-funded research on various types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, China, where the first outbreak of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus occurred.

More than 900 pages of materials were obtained by The Intercept in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the publication against the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The documents detail the work of the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund research into bat coronaviruses at the Chinese lab. They include two previously unpublished grant proposals funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates related to EcoHealth Alliance’s research.

One of the grants awarded by the NIH to the EcoHealth Alliance, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” amounted to $666,422.

The grant proposal outlines an ambitious plan, led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, to “investigate the ecology, evolutionary biology, and transmission dynamics of bat coronaviruses at the human-wildlife interface.”

“Specifically, we will conduct field studies in China to obtain high-quality samples from bats, and identify, characterize and isolate known and novel coronavirus,” the grant proposal reads. “We will analyze the patterns of coronavirus transmission among bats and other wildlife, and the risk of spillover to humans.”

Daszak’s research also involved screening people who work with live animals.

The documents also note that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at the Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment and not at the WIV, as was previously assumed, The Intercept reported.
A laboratory technician working on samples from people to be tested for the new coronavirus at “Fire Eye” laboratory in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on Feb. 6, 2020. (STR/AFP via Getty Images)
The grant proposal also acknowledges the potential dangers of the study, including during fieldwork, stating that it “involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”

“There is also some risk of exposure to pathogens or physical injury while handling bats, civets, rodents or other animals, their blood samples or their excreta,” the document reads. “Virus isolation may be a challenge.”

The bat coronavirus grant provided the EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans, according to The Intercept.

The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019, but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.

The second grant awarded by the NIH to EcoHealth Alliance, “Understanding Risk of Zoonotic Virus Emergence in Emergent Infectious Disease Hotpots of Southeast Asia,” was awarded in August 2020 and extends through 2025.

The grant proposal states that it “will bring leaders in emerging disease research from the U.S., Thailand, Singapore, and the three major Malaysian administrative regions together to build an early warning system to safeguard against pandemic disease threats.”

The team would “identify novel viruses from Southeast Asian wildlife, characterize their capacity to infect and cause illness in people, and use serological assays of samples from people in rural communities with high wildlife contact to identify the background rate of exposure, and risk factors that drive this.”

In-depth surveillance at hospitals serving those communities would be used to examine if cryptic outbreaks are caused by those novel agents, which researchers hoped would help them develop a rapid response to outbreaks in such regions.
Researchers with Franceville interdisciplinary Medical Research Center collect samples from a bat inside a cave in the Zadie region of Gabon on Nov. 25, 2020. (Steeve Jordan/AFP via Getty Images)
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments, and the newly released documents will no doubt raise further questions regarding the theory that the CCP virus pandemic originated from a lab leak in Wuhan.

Following the release of the documents, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, wrote on Twitter:

“The materials confirm the grants supported the construction—in Wuhan—of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells.

“The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.”

In August, the World Health Organization (WHO) urged China to share raw data from the earliest COVID-19 cases, saying that it’s “vitally important to know how the COVID-19 pandemic began” and to set an example for establishing the origins of all future animal-human spillover events.

A WHO-led team spent four weeks in and around the central city of Wuhan with Chinese researchers in January 2021 to investigate the origins of the pandemic.

In March, researchers said that the virus had probably been transmitted to humans from bats through another animal and that “introduction through a laboratory incident was considered to be an extremely unlikely pathway.”

However, the Chinese communist regime has faced fierce criticism from the international community, which has accused them of engaging in a cover-up.

In July, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters that investigations into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic in China were being hampered by the lack of raw data on the first days of spread there and urged the regime to be more transparent.

[MAL]

We are nothing more than lab rats to Fauci.

You guys really should listen to me the first time. I am almost always right.

Fauci Argued Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research Outweighed Pandemic Risk in 2012 Paper

By BRITTANY BERNSTEIN
May 28, 2021 2:59 PM

In a newly resurfaced paper from 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci argued that the benefits of gain-of-function research are worth the increased risk of a potential pandemic-causing lab accident.

The Weekend Australian unearthed a paper Fauci wrote for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he argued in support of gain-of-function research. Such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly. Experts have raised the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses have been conducted.

Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing:

In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?

Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.

Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern.

The Weekend Australian report adds that Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, did not alert senior White House officials before lifting a ban on gain-of-function research in 2017.



In 2014, the Obama administration paused funding for gain-of-function experiments in 22 fields, including those involving SARS, influenza and MERS because of the increased risk such experimentation carries of causing a pandemic. In 2012, when Fauci authored the paper supporting gain-of-function research, there was a voluntary ban on such experiments related to highly infectious influenza viruses.
All Our Opinion in Your Inbox
NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.

Yet the EcoHealth Alliance diverted $600,000 in grants from the NIH to the WIV in the form of sub-grants from 2014 through 2019, for the purpose of studying bat coronaviruses.

The U.S. government has reportedly assessed that the WIV was conducting gain-of-function research in some form, according to a March Politico excerpt of Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin’s book on the subject. Jamie Metzl, an expert on gene editing for the World Health Organization, has also said that the WIV performed gain-of-function research.

Fauci maintains that no U.S. funding that went to the WIV was directed toward gain-of-function research, but he conceded during congressional testimony this week that it is impossible to guarantee that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not use American funds to perform gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.

Fauci wrote in 2012 that virologists needed to respect “that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally.”



Meanwhile, President Biden on Wednesday said that as U.S. intelligence officials have “coalesced around two likely scenarios” for how COVID-19 originated, he has tasked the intelligence community with redoubling their investigative efforts to bring the U.S. closer to a “definitive conclusion” within 90 days.

He said he had his national security advisor direct the intelligence community to prepare a report on their most up-to-date analysis of the origins of COVID-19 in March, “including whether it emerged from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

[HuffHall]

Bias in the news is one thing...but when has FOX ever knowingly lied in an attempt to frame a President for treason? Everybody knew from the very beginning that the story was fake...the media knew...the FBI knew...Hillary knew...everybody involved knew right from the start that there was absolutely no truth in the Steel Dossier, but they all pushed the lie for 4 years. Where is the Fox fake news equivalent to that monstrosity? In the end it was Hillary that paid a foreigner to interfere in the election...she is the one that colluded with someone with ties to Putin. Where the F is your outrage? It's like Russian collusion to interfere in the election is all good if Russia is on your side. You can't possibly think that Fox's political spin is the same thing as framing a president and his staff.

Fox news lies every day, don't be that guys dumb a$$.

[MAL]

Here I cut and pasted it for youhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/proud-boys-oath-keepers-extremist-rally-september-18-washington-d-c/

It says that only about 300-500 people will attend. Half of them are probably FBI agents inciting the crowd.

[MAL]

Fox news lies every day, don't be that guys dumb a$$.

I gave you a very clear and precise example of how all the mainstream media ran with a known lie for 4 years claiming the president was guilty of treason. I don't watch FOX, give me one example of even a little lie. Fox is a liberal organization that has a few conservatives working for them.

[HuffHall]

I don't watch Fox either but with people like Ingraham Carlson and Hannity on daily, I'm sure my assumption is safe. Since you like to cut and paste though here ya go. Now get back to your Q chat rooms and be a good little Patriot consuming all your deep state nonsense. Your life is sad

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/17/b...E&gclsrc=aw.ds

[oldpioneer]

It says that only about 300-500 people will attend. Half of them are probably FBI agents inciting the crowd.

The place will be crawling with agents. But I don’t think it’s Possible to incite them to do anything. Are you saying that someone standing up and screaming let’s take back our country and head to the Capitol building is inciting? No those are only words. Even if they come from the President of the United States they don’t mean anything. By the way I’m not a drummer but I still show up to band practice early because drummers are notoriously late and sit on the kit until he came. Let me know if you want me to give you a lesson on that snare!