Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Swedish study finds that vaccines INCREASE all-cause mortality by 20%

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Swedish study finds that vaccines INCREASE all-cause mortality by 20%

    Swedish study finds that covid vaccines deplete the immune system, INCREASE all-cause mortality by 20%

    Here is a public health Scotland statistical report that has very similar findings
    https://publichealthscotland.scot/me...ion_report.pdf




    A Swedish study involving four million people raises several red flags concerning covid vaccines and death rates . The preprint paper to...



    A Swedish study involving four million people raises several red flags concerning covid vaccines and death rates. The preprint paper took a closer look at real world vaccine effectiveness. The study revealed three main issues. The paper found that the vaccine doesn’t offer protection at all. Its so-called protection plunged significantly after six months, even for severe cases of COVID-19. The study doesn’t just show that vaccine effectiveness is waning. It shows that the protection is a fallacy altogether. The study concluded that those who are vaccinated are more likely to be infected and suffer severe disease than people who aren’t vaccinated.
    Covid jabs accelerate death totals in two-week follow-up period after the second dose


    The study also found that excess deaths from all causes are rising in Sweden, like in most countries, but the study did not examine these excess deaths. Finally, the study found a total of 3,939 deaths out of 4.03 million people who were given two doses of the experimental vaccine. These deaths occurred within two weeks after the person received their second covid shot. This data shows that people are dying at a rate 20 percent higher than normal in the two-week follow-up period after their second shot.

    When the data is extrapolated over an entire year, the annual mortality rate in Sweden can be expected to rise by three times its average magnitude! In a typical year, about 1 in 115 Swedish citizens pass away. In a population that is poisoned and degraded by covid shots, that mortality rate could realistically rise by 2.5 percent over the next year. The new mortality rate could be approximately 1 in 40 people going into the new year. The only confounding factor that could skew these numbers in the coming year is the young, healthy population that won’t get vaccinated.

    According to the all-cause Swedish mortality data from 2015 to 2019, there is an average of 3,300 deaths every two weeks for a population of roughly 10.6 million. This takes into account the entire population, and the data generally stays the same from year to year.

    When these numbers are compared to a 2021 cohort of fully vaccinated people, it appears that the vaccines are increasing the all-cause mortality rate by 20 percent. There was a total of 3,939 deaths in a two-week period following vaccination. If the vaccines are saving lives, then the mortality rate after vaccination should be negligible, not equal or even greater than the average mortality rate for all cause deaths. This is a medical travesty! The Swedish people who are receiving two vaccines in a 4 million people cohort are accounting for every single death and then some in a two-week follow-up period.
    Covid jabs make people more susceptible to infection and DEATH — a reality that can no longer be suppressed


    Let this Swedish data sink in: Even if the vaccines had no effect on the death rate, there would be around 3,300 deaths every two weeks in the 4.03 million cohort. There should not be more deaths than that because the entire country of Sweden does not have more deaths than that in this same time period. This fact is made more troubling considering that the baseline number for the vaccinated group should not even be 3,300 deaths. Under average circumstances, a large slice of these deaths would include unvaccinated people in the remaining 6.6 million population. The baseline number for the vaccinated is actually lower than 3,300 under the best circumstances. So, the 20 percent increase in death post-vaccination is a generous and conservative observation of the data.

    So how do the vaccine manufacturers and the government explain away this data? People are dying at an alarming rate post-vaccination and their protection against covid also turns out to be a FARCE just months later. How will the ensuing destruction of individual immunity also affect the death rate in the years to come?

  • #2
    great post. Hey, did you head to the Covid-chella festival in DC last weekend. Despite the freezing conditions and they are off work, most of the speakers wore their white lab coats. That gives them instant credibility.....
    Always support your local wrestling tournament concession stands!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by oldpioneer View Post
      great post. Hey, did you head to the Covid-chella festival in DC last weekend. Despite the freezing conditions and they are off work, most of the speakers wore their white lab coats. That gives them instant credibility.....
      I have no idea what you are talking about. I would say the the scientist that invented the vaccine technology would have some credibility. I choose to listen to the experts and follow the science.

      "Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA technology, which has been used to create the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. He has been speaking out about the dangers of the COVID shot, such as the damages the Coronavirus spike protein causes in the body. In this interview with Del Bigtree, Dr. Robert Malone calls for a stop of COVID vaccines. He explains that the COVID vaccine can cause enhanced immune response, which creates a worse reaction when exposed to the natural coronavirus. He says that it can create autoimmunities in the the body. Dr. Robert Malone also said that the spike protein is the most dangerous part of the virus (which is in the COVID vaccine) is similar to spike proteins in our bodies, and can open up (not just pass through) the blood brain barrier. This has very dangerous implications for the human body, and why there have been so many adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine.

      Watch the interview with Dr. Robert Malone on the highwire at this link:"

      thehighwire.com/videos/mrna-vaccine-inventor-calls-for-stop-of-covid-vax/

      00000arrier. These effects can be devastating to the body, causing a cytokine storm, autoimmune disorders, and neurological problems.

      Comment


      • #4
        People are dying unnecessarily because of Obama care death panels and centralized one size fits all treatments.

        Florida Doctor: Families Sneak Ivermectin to Loved Ones in Hospitals With COVID-19, See Improvement


        By Nanette Holt

        January 26, 2022 Updated: January 26, 2022

        A Florida doctor says families of loved ones hospitalized with COVID-19 are resorting to desperate measures when approved treatments have failed.

        And when it’s not too late, some have seen tremendous success by sneaking medications prohibited by hospitals to patients, says Eduardo Balbona, an independent internist in Jacksonville.

        He’s helped dozens of seriously ill patients recover using ivermectin and other drugs and supplements not officially approved in the treatment of COVID-19, he says.

        Hospitals receive payments from the federal government for treating patients with COVID-19. But those payments are tied to their use of approved treatments only, as outlined in the CARES Act. When there’s nothing left to try under those protocols, families naturally research alternatives, Balbona says, often learning about treatments touted by independent physicians around the country.

        Hoping to try anything that might work, families around the country have filed lawsuits asking judges to intervene.

        In some cases, judges have ordered hospitals to allow the use of other treatments, such as ivermectin. Some of those seriously ill patients have recovered. In other cases, judges have sided with hospitals and declined the families’ requests to try.

        Meanwhile, independent physicians like Balbona watch helplessly, feeling that when families ask, they should be allowed to try medications they believe can turn critically ill patients around. But independent doctors often have limited hospital privileges and may be banned from seeing their own patients in some hospitals.
        Eduardo Balbona, M.D., completed specialty training in internal medicine at the National Naval Medical Center and served as a physician at the U.S. Capitol, caring for senators, congressmen, and Supreme Court Justices. (Eduardo Balbona, M.D.)

        That was the case recently for Balbona, who was contacted by a worried wife after she read in The Epoch Times about his involvement in another family’s lawsuit seeking to try his recommendations.

        Based on what the woman told him, Balbona said he felt strongly her husband could recover if treated with the regimen he prescribes for seriously ill COVID-19 patients. The treatment protocol he follows, with slight modifications based on each patient’s needs, was developed by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

        “The husband was very ill,” Balbona said. “He’s in his 50s, a big strong guy. She called me desperate because they gave him remdesivir [in the hospital] and she made them stop it, and he started getting worse and worse. And his oxygen demand went up.”

        By the time she called Balbona for help, her husband needed 60 liters of oxygen per minute. That’s too high to manage at home, even with rented medical equipment, Balbona said.

        “If you can get them down to 40 or 50 [liters per minute] you can do high-flow oxygen at that level,” Balbona told The Epoch Times. “That’s a lot of oxygen.”

        He said he promised he’d try if her husband improved enough to go home. And then he’d take over managing his care. Meanwhile, he said, he gave her prescriptions, so she could collect the medications she’d need at home. That was on a Friday.

        He learned later that she’d filled the prescriptions, took the medications to the hospital, and gave them to her husband. By Tuesday, the man was discharged and fully following the protocol Balbona prescribed. A few days later, he was off the oxygen. Now, he’s recovering, Balbona said. But they’re afraid to share their good news publicly.

        “The people who snuck in the ivermectin… they are scared to death,” Balbona said. “She is sure that the government is going to find out who she is” and possibly arrest her for giving medications not approved by the hospital.

        He said she told him, “I did it. I knew it was wrong. I don’t know what the penalties are. What could they do to me?”

        And that’s the real crime, Balbona believes.

        In New Hampshire, lawmakers now are considering legislation that would make the state the first in the country to make Ivermectin available as an over-the-counter medicine, and sanction it as a protected treatment for COVID-19. Similar bills in three other states have failed.

        The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Leah Cushman (R) is a registered nurse, who told The Epoch Times, “I have absolutely no doubt lives will be saved if human grade ivermectin was available to COVID patients.”

        Two doctors testified about her proposed bill, warning the legislation could lead to dangerous side effects for people who use the drug. But Cushman believes she’ll have the votes to keep the bill moving toward becoming law.

        The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved the use of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, though the drug is used in humans to treat a variety of conditions.

        An FDA web page warning against using ivermectin for COVID-19 also mentions that clinical trials investigating it as a treatment are ongoing.

        The FDA has not responded to a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA) asking for details about any reports of side effects related to the use of ivermectin — formulations for animals and humans — to treat COVID-19. The agency also has not responded to a FOIA request for details about clinical trials and when the drug could reach the stage when its use under the Right To Try Act could be allowed.

        Studies about the safety and efficacy of using ivermectin in the treatment for COVID-19 have led to all or part of 22 countries approving its use. But in the United States, doctors who rely on payments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services aren’t allowed to use it.

        When Balbona heard about the proposed legislation, he immediately called two state senators, and two attorneys who are patients, suggesting that they propose similar legislation in Florida. Florida lawmakers currently are in session in Tallahassee through March 11.

        “If we can get legislation to say, ‘Let the doctor do what he thinks is best,’ I think that would be wonderful,” Balbona said. “If New Hampshire can do this, why can’t we

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by oldpioneer View Post
          great post. Hey, did you head to the Covid-chella festival in DC last weekend. Despite the freezing conditions and they are off work, most of the speakers wore their white lab coats. That gives them instant credibility.....
          I don't get my talking points from Yahoo News. I read the studies Listen to the experts and couple that with commonsense. Here is a long video with several scientists and medical experts. I think the truth of the covid situation is somewhere in the middle of this group and the media narrative...and with the media narrative being driven by a man that is the highest paid federal employee, that holds patens on the vaccines through his organization...and he has ties to the lab that he paid with our tax dollars to work on gain of function research with bat viruses. That man is Fauci, he made 10 million dollars in 2020...his salary is over $400,000. Where did the rest of his income come from? I am going to have more trust in the experts that are fighting mass censorship to get their facts and opinions to the public. Here they are...the discussion starts at 40 minutes into the video. I strongly recommend watching this video. I am sure that some of the opinions are just opinions...but the facts are shocking.

          https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a...f=6zof&mrefc=2

          Comment

          Working...
          X