CCL vs SWSC

[The Barnicle]

106- Vazquez vs Kaminski
113- Ragusin vs Ramos
120- Melendez vs Zaccone
126- Burnoski vs Precin
132- Woods vs Nolan
138- Chumbley vs Pierendozzi
145- Coleman vs Fernandez
152- Lewan vs Reese
160- Ortiz vs Radev
170- Gross vs Pullen
182- Sweir vs Mihajlovich
195- Christensen vs Goodman
220- Anderson vs Olds
285- Ruffin vs ORourke

[maddog81]

106- Vazquez vs Kaminski
113- Ragusin vs Ramos
120- Melendez vs Zaccone
126- Burnoski vs Precin
132- Woods vs Nolan
138- Chumbley vs Pierendozzi
145- Coleman vs Fernandez
152- Lewan vs Reese
160- Ortiz vs Radev
170- Gross vs Pullen
182- Sweir vs Mihajlovich
195- Christensen vs Goodman
220- Anderson vs Olds
285- Ruffin vs ORourke

The final would be 56-8 CCL

[Southern Scrambler]

Put Montini in any conference in the state and the result is not going to change a whole lot when matching up conference champs in a mythical dual.

[Red Turban]

How would seconds and thirds go?

It feels like CCL would still win a tight one seconds vs SWSC winners.

[Stritchjanitor]

How would seconds and thirds go?

It feels like CCL would still win a tight one seconds vs SWSC winners.

again take montini out.

[maddog81]

Put Montini in any conference in the state and the result is not going to change a whole lot when matching up conference champs in a mythical dual.

106 Soleto vs Kaminsky
113 Mis vs Ramos
120 Uribe vs Zaccone
126 Callaway vs Precin
132 Fleck vs Nolan
138 Chumbley vs Pierendozzi
145 Coleman vs Fernandez
152 Countrymann vs Reese
160 Smith vs Radev
170 Gross vs Pullen
182 Benoit vs Mihajlovich
195 Kaminski vs Goodman
220 Anderson vs Olds
285 Ruffin vs O'Rourke

Taking the 2nd place finisher on the weights Montini won I still would take CCL.

[coachperry]

So this is supost to be the difference between the conferences? You have no winners or losers? are you saying that these matches would go ccl? I'm sorry but the Ccl is a glorified quad meet and that's it. You have 3 dominate teams in the Ccl and every other team brings there studs to fill. I'm not saying the other one was that tuff. But your just assuming that all these kids would just lay down because montini , mc and marmion would walk into the room. I don't think so.

[maddog81]

So this is supost to be the difference between the conferences? You have no winners or losers? are you saying that these matches would go ccl? I'm sorry but the Ccl is a glorified quad meet and that's it. You have 3 dominate teams in the Ccl and every other team brings there studs to fill. I'm not saying the other one was that tuff. But your just assuming that all these kids would just lay down because montini , mc and marmion would walk into the room. I don't think so.

If you look at most of the other conferences there are 1-2 dominant teams in each conference and that's nationwide. No assumption that anyone is laying down on anything.

[coachperry]

If you look at most of the other conferences there are 1-2 dominant teams in each conference and that's nationwide.

I agree with u there , but that dual you just wrote wouldn't go as easy as everyone on here thinks.

[maddog81]

I agree with u there , but that dual you just wrote wouldn't go as easy as everyone on here thinks.

Again, it is a mythical dual and it is possible it wouldn't fold out to being that big of a margin its my opinion.

[coachperry]

Now that I'm reading this more the arrogance is really surprising to me. In the so called 2nd place kids match against the swsc your first 5 matches have been won by swsc kids already during the season . You have 2 matches that you can't assume anything on and I believe 2 of the other upper weights have gone swsc way also. So I don't know there.
As for the champion on champion dual some of those are obvious but to be a total runaway I don't think so.

[maddog81]

Now that I'm reading this more the arrogance is really surprising to me. In the so called 2nd place kids match against the swsc your first 5 matches have been won by swsc kids already during the season . You have 2 matches that you can't assume anything on and I believe 2 of the other upper weights have gone swsc way also. So I don't know there.
As for the champion on champion dual some of those are obvious but to be a total runaway I don't think so.

I think 106 would go CCL ways. The next 4 would be definitely go swsc way. But from 138 -182 i think there would be alot of points scored for CCL. That's being arrogant?

[coachperry]

I think 106 would go CCL ways. The next 4 would be definitely go swsc way. But from 138 -182 i think there would be alot of points scored for CCL. That's being arrogant?

Which dual are u talking about ? The a or b ? I think 138- 182 would go back and forth. And yes a little bit. Because you know different styles of wrestling work differently. All I'm saying is it's not a runaway show like everyone thinks.

[maddog81]

Which dual are u talking about ? The a or b ? I think 138- 182 would go back and forth. And yes a little bit. Because you know different styles of wrestling work differently. All I'm saying is it's not a runaway show like everyone thinks.

Dual B without Montini is the one I talking about. That one I think is a very close match where I think the CCL would win by the narrowest of margins. The one with Montini I think would be pretty lopsided. Coach, I'm not downgrading the swsc there are some excellent wrestlers there. But in my OPINION the CCL is deeper and better right now.

[Red Turban]

Doesn't SWSC have about 4,000 schools with combined enrollment of over 1 million students?