View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-26-2019
ChiefIllini1 ChiefIllini1 is offline
Olympian
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,770
Article Two: BRIBERY.

The Government must prove these elements of Bribery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ß 666, although reasonable inferences can be drawn:

Quote:
Whoever corruptly gives anything of value to any person, with intent to influence or reward an agent of an organization in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving anything of value of $5,000 or more.
A spokeswoman for Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi told the media that their office was reviewing the Trump University matter and deciding whether or not to pursue a criminal case. Six days later, Trumpís charity donated $25,000.00 to a political action committee formed to obtain donations for Bondiís reelection.

Bondi did not pursue criminal charges against Trump University.

The reasonable inference here is that Trump corruptly intended to influence the prosecutorial discretion of the Florida Attorney General. If there is a record of one communication between Trump and Bondi or Trump and the Bondi PAC during those six days (or shortly thereafter), the crime is basically proven.

Moreover, this is a two-fer! The president of your country used a check from his charity to pay off Bondi. Yes, he stole from his charity to bribe a politician! It's insane, but true, my friends. Here's the check:


The reading of the Articles of Impeachment will continue ...
Reply With Quote