Originally posted by Fighting Scot
View Post
This link is a deep dive into how the ballots are laid out, what would happen when a candidate is removed and discrepancies in the stated explanation.
https://canncon.substack.com/p/is-de...the-new-antrim
This following quote is from the same article. A hand recount found a 15.4% discrepancy Brad Raffensperger's results. It seems that machines have trouble counting.
"Previously, VoterGA released a report detailing the Cobb County Vinings cityhood hand count audit from early June, which determined via a hand count audit that while Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger received roughly 53 percent of the GOP Election Day votes in the Vinings 04 precinct, the Dominion machine “awarded Raffensperger with 68.4% of those same votes.”
Here is a CISA report from last month detailing exactly how these vote discrepancies could have happened. The Government is telling us that Dominion software is not secure.

National Cyber Awareness System CISA Releases Security Advisory on Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X
Original release date: June 03, 2022
CISA has released an Industrial Controls Systems Advisory (ICSA) detailing vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot.
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in ICSA-22-154A, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.
Comment