Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Release the Kraken

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by HuffHall View Post
    Nowhere in the article is that stated, MAL doing his best Trump impression just speaking BS, I'll copy the response from the 3 conservative judges who of course dissented


    The three dissenting conservative justices, led by Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, said the court should have decided whether votes should have counted in each of the four categories Trump challenged and also clarified the law for future elections.

    “A significant portion of the public does not believe that the November 3, 2020, presidential election was fairly conducted,” Roggensack wrote. “Once again, four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast.”

    Liberal justices Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky, who sided with Hagedorn, wrote separately to emphasize that there was no evidence of fraud in Wisconsin's election.

    “Wisconsin voters complied with the election rulebook,” Dallet and Karofksy said. “No penalties were committed and the final score was the result of a free and fair election.”

    I thought by now you would have figured out that you were wrong. They made 2 decisions...the one that you found and the one that I posted.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by oldpioneer View Post
      Couple of side stories. Newsmax, trumps newly anointed trusted media source referred to Biden as president elect. Look for his Twitter to light up later tonight.

      Also I was just watching the news and apparently there was a youth wrestling tournament in Lynnwood. I didn’t want to post it by wrestling because I don’t want any club or team to get in trouble or something because of what I am posting. Apparently they are investigating
      The swing states are sending alternate electors. It is not entirely unusual for that to happen, but this year there may be a serious attempt to use the alternates. Pence as the President of the Senate is the person that is tasked with counting the votes. If someone challenges the electors they have 2 hours to make a decision on which electors to use. If they can't make a decision I think both sets of electors get tossed. At The end of the day if neither candidate has 270, it goes to the House for a one vote per state format. There is a significant debate over the interpretation of these rules...It could get fun.

      I think Trump is running out the clock and holding the ball for one last shot from the 270 point line.

      I think we should Put the Democrats in corals and have them kicked out if they disrupt the count...if they want to see the ballots they can use binoculars.

      Comment


      • Still haven't answered the question. I don't care what crazy theories crackpot websites have to offer. Did one Judge find that one undocumented immigrant voted? Just need one.

        What seems to be the main argument for why so many of these refugees voted in our election is that it is easy to do:

        All you need is a fake driver's license or picture ID to register to vote. In many states you can just walk into the voting booth and vote. Per Wikipedia: No ID required to vote at ballot box: California, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C. No ID is required to vote in North Carolina as of Dec. 31, 2019.
        It is a silly argument. Racist, too! You know what else is easy to do? Rob a bank. All you need is a gun and a note, and, well, actually, you don't need either of those things. You can simply hold your hand in your pocket and say to the teller, "I have a gun and/or bomb. Give me your money." You don't have to register to rob a bank. You don't need a picture ID. You don't have to apply for a driver's license to rob a bank. It's easy-peasy. Yet, it doesn't happen that often. Why?

        The racist underpinnings here are disgusting.

        Much like the racist connotations in the argument that heavily urban areas are rampant with voter fraud. If Democrats win the Senate, we will start to see a crackdown on the real un-American activities of voter suppression, voter caging, illegally purging the voter rolls, gerrymandering and the like, all of which the GOP has done to keep people from voting. Such racist un-American ****heads.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ChiefIllini1 View Post
          [SIZE=16px]Still haven't answered the question. I don't care what crazy theories crackpot websites have to offer. Did one Judge find that one undocumented immigrant voted? Just need one.

          What seems to be the main argument for why so many of these refugees voted in our election is that it is easy to do:



          It is a silly argument. Racist, too! You know what else is easy to do? Rob a bank. All you need is a gun and a note, and, well, actually, you don't need either of those things. You can simply hold your hand in your pocket and say to the teller, "I have a gun and/or bomb. Give me your money." You don't have to register to rob a bank. You don't need a picture ID. You don't have to apply for a driver's license to rob a bank. It's easy-peasy. Yet, it doesn't happen that often. Why?

          The racist underpinnings here are disgusting.

          Much like the racist connotations in the argument that heavily urban areas are rampant with voter fraud. If Democrats win the Senate, we will start to see a crackdown on the real un-American activities of voter suppression, voter caging, illegally purging the voter rolls, gerrymandering and the like, all of which the GOP has done to keep people from voting. Such racist un-American ****heads.
          I just gave you 4000 in Nevada alone. The numbers are from Nevada DMV records cross referenced with the state voter information. It is not debatable. Judges fight for illegals alien's right to vote.

          Comment


          • Yep Chief! When they say Trump would have one accept for “ “Heavily urban areas”. That is exactly what they are saying. I guess we are finding out when and where they were talking about when they said make America great again! Back in the good old days everybody was allowed to vote And they had no problems in Mayberry...
            Always support your local wrestling tournament concession stands!!!

            Comment


            • Mal your proof is hard to fight. Do the Republicans just have the worst lawyers in the history of the world. Where is Cousin Vinny when you really need him?

              Comment


              • The urban voters are the ones that have been disenfranchised by the fraud. I find it hard to believe that the "most racist President in history" received more votes from black Americans than any Republican since Nixon. When you take out the fraud in Urban areas you would see Trumps numbers with minorities has blown away anything expectations.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by eyecu2 View Post
                  Mal your proof is hard to fight. Do the Republicans just have the worst lawyers in the history of the world. Where is Cousin Vinny when you really need him?
                  It doesn't matter who your lawyer is or how strong the case if the Judge says that you don't have standing. The judges have been saying that Trump hasn't been harmed by illegals voting and other allegations of voter fraud so he doesn't have standing in a court of law.

                  "In law, standing or locus standi is the term for the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case."

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ChiefIllini1 View Post
                    [SIZE=16px]Still haven't answered the question. I don't care what crazy theories crackpot websites have to offer. Did one Judge find that one undocumented immigrant voted? Just need one.

                    What seems to be the main argument for why so many of these refugees voted in our election is that it is easy to do:



                    It is a silly argument. Racist, too! You know what else is easy to do? Rob a bank. All you need is a gun and a note, and, well, actually, you don't need either of those things. You can simply hold your hand in your pocket and say to the teller, "I have a gun and/or bomb. Give me your money." You don't have to register to rob a bank. You don't need a picture ID. You don't have to apply for a driver's license to rob a bank. It's easy-peasy. Yet, it doesn't happen that often. Why?

                    The racist underpinnings here are disgusting.

                    Much like the racist connotations in the argument that heavily urban areas are rampant with voter fraud. If Democrats win the Senate, we will start to see a crackdown on the real un-American activities of voter suppression, voter caging, illegally purging the voter rolls, gerrymandering and the like, all of which the GOP has done to keep people from voting. Such racist un-American ****heads.
                    Bank robbing is rare because rare because of the risk verses reward is not worth while. Banks have cameras every where and they don't have much money in the cash drawer...and the penalty is very high, even for a first time offender.

                    Speeding is illegal but yet everybody with a car and a drivers license does it...because the worst thing that could happen is a ticket.

                    The penalty is very low for voter fraud, the crime is very easy and it's hard to prosecute.

                    Here is a case of 8000 dead people trying to register to vote in this election, that is going through the courts now in California...the story has a liberal spin...so Chief, talk to me in six months and I will show you 2 people that were found guilty in a court of law, of trying to cast 8000 votes.

                    https://www.latimes.com/california/s...ceased-persons

                    Comment


                    • Anyone else picture MAL, waking up each morning, hair all matted, mustard stains on his T-shirt he hasn't changed out of in 3 or 4 days, starting a new day looking for YouTube videos and debunked stop the steal articles all the while thinking, don't worry Mr. President MAL is on the case. God he loves your kind of zealotry.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by HuffHall View Post
                        Anyone else picture MAL, waking up each morning, hair all matted, mustard stains on his T-shirt he hasn't changed out of in 3 or 4 days, starting a new day looking for YouTube videos and debunked stop the steal articles all the while thinking, don't worry Mr. President MAL is on the case. God he loves your kind of zealotry.
                        Are you getting tired of discussions with actual facts?

                        Comment


                        • This thread is great. I need help with an idea. Chief I remember you seem pretty handy with graphics on the Internet. I have the greatest idea. I just saw that Trump file suit against New Mexico. I lost count of how many cases and states are involved now. But remember when Howard Dean lost Iowa but then gave this one for the Gipper speech and then started yelling out a bunch of random states and then did this hehawww! I think it would be funny if someone put trumps head on Howard Dean’s body for that speech and maybe have Rudy a.k.a. my cousin Vinny say something like we are still going to fight in fact we are filing suit against.......Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Arizona.....rahhhhhhhh! ‍♂️
                          Last edited by oldpioneer; 12-15-2020, 12:43 PM.
                          Always support your local wrestling tournament concession stands!!!

                          Comment


                          • When you or the clown show court Jesters provide any, that will be a first

                            Comment


                            • Lets play a game, who said this about fatso in 2016?

                              "Every time Donald thinks things are not going in his direction, he claims whatever it is is rigged against him. There was even a time when he didn’t get an Emmy for his TV program three years in a row, and he started tweeting that the Emmys were rigged. He raged against them on Twitter, “The Emmys are all politics, that’s why, despite nominations, The Apprentice never won—even though it should have won many times over." This is a mindset, this is how Donald thinks, and it’s funny, but it’s also really troubling."

                              Pretty much sums this POS up to a tee.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by oldpioneer View Post
                                This thread is great. I need help with an idea. Chief I remember you seem pretty handy with graphics on the Internet. I have the greatest idea. I just saw that Trump file suit against New Mexico. I lost count of how many cases and states are involved now. But remember when Howard Dean lost Iowa but then gave this one for the Gipper speech and then started yelling out a bunch of random states and then did this hehawww! I think it would be funny if someone put trumps head on Howard Dean’s body for that speech and maybe have Rudy a.k.a. my cousin Vinny say something like we are still going to fight in fact we are filing suit against.......Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Arizona.....rahhhhhhhh! ‍♂️
                                That's a great idea, OP! I can do pretty good photoshopping of images and basic videos. I don't have the knowledge or professional tools to exchange heads in a video.

                                My favorite video during this horrible era was a GIF that showed Trump's head on a two-year old putting a one-footer. When he misses, he throws a tantrum, falling to the ground screaming and seizing out. Classic! Wish I could do that.

                                By the way, when the impeached loser and his allies get thrown out of court in New Mexico, they will be 1-60 in post-election litigation. Cheers!


                                GO AMERICA!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X