Release the Kraken

[MAL]

A genius and a really smart Professor.
The genius (Jovan Hutton Pulitzer) was offered $10 million dollars to stop working on election integrity...but you won't even click on the link. The personal story of how he developed his gift is incredible.

https://rumble.com/vfi5x9-jovan-hutt...elections.html

[HuffHall]

When you use quotation marks it's supposed to be a quote.

I have read the legal document...Sydney doesn't say that anywhere in it. That is just a typical lie that Democrat lawyers know that you are too stupid to actually look up.

Love your MAGA tears, keep em coming

[oldpioneer]

We need truth is out there on this thread. I saw he posted but I don’t like to mix politics with the wrestling. Truth Come on down. Or could he him and Mal be the same person?

[MAL]

Another good video by Liz Harris.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL7tpJ3eblI

[MAL]

We need truth is out there on this thread. I saw he posted but I don’t like to mix politics with the wrestling. Truth Come on down. Or could he him and Mal be the same person?

MAL is in all caps. If I had two screen names I would use them both down here.

[MAL]

Democrats will cheat anywhere that there is an election...even in Montana.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-6lxawv6cc

[MAL]

Here is definitive proof of an algorithm used In 9 counties Michigan. The black line is voter Registration. It is consistently higher than the voting age population.

The blue line is the voting age population.

The next line is the prediction that is based on an algorithm.

The red line is the recorded ballots received. In several places the number of ballots cast are more than the number of eligible voters.

They have proven that they can predict the number of ballots cast with near 100% accuracy based on the census data and what they are calling the "key"

The censorship is ridiculous.

The have also found an internal modem and web traffic to Taiwan, including IP addresses.

This evidence is going into court today.

Even this pot head can understand.

CannCon Explains the Report from Michigan. Subscribe to CannCon on You Tube, Rumble and Locals

[MAL]

Nevada Republicans arnt buying what you are selling.

Nevada Republicans Just STUNNED Liberals – They Drop The Hammer On One Of Their Own
By Adam Casalino|April 12, 2021

SHARE

What’s Happening:


If you listen to the media, even today, they’ll tell you the 2020 Election was a perfect, fair, and open election.

They continue to deny (like children with their fingers in their ears) the shocking evidence that suggests otherwise.




Despite what many people think, however, the media wants us to accept what happened. Just move on with our lives.

But it’s not over yet.

One of the states that had contest results, Nevada, is seeing a top leader punished by the GOP.

And liberals are taking notice.

From The Hill:

The Nevada Republican Central Committee voted on Saturday to censure Nevada GOP Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske over claims that she failed to prevent widespread voter fraud in the state during the 2020 presidential election…

“The irresponsible messaging of the Nevada Secretary of State, claiming, without investigating, that this election was error free, causing these attacks on our Nevada Republican Party,” the cover letter reads.

The Republican Party of Nevada voted to censure the state’s Secretary of State for failing to confront claims of voter fraud in the 2020 Election.

All throughout the fallout of the November 3 elections, we heard reports of fraud all over the country.

Nevada was one of those states. The elections office conveniently took a long time to count votes, in a scheme some claim was aimed at harvesting ballots.



As in many other states, this Republican official mysteriously refused to confront ample evidence that fraud occurred.

So, her party is hitting back hard.

A censure is a strong message that her party does not approve of her conduct. It can be the first step in limiting her influence or even removing her from office.

While the party does not have the power to do that, they can pressure the governor or legislature to take other measures.

Cegavske, as you can imagine, was defiant over the news. She refused to even apologize and even claimed she would continue to oversee elections in the future.

I doubt that, Barb. Don’t be surprised if you end up looking for a job before 2022.
Key Takeaways:

• Nevada’s GOP censured the state’s Secretary of State over the 2020 Election.
• The party accused her of refusing to investigate claims of widespread voter fraud.
• Cegavske claimed there were no signs of fraud, despite numerous reports.

[MAL]

Here is a fun video...It looks like Biden's mask is pealing off his face...no, not his COVID mask, his fake silicone Hollywood body double type mask.

https://threepercenternation.com/202...N%204-12%202PM

[ChiefIllini1]

MAL wrote, improvidently:

Originally posted by ChiefIllini1 View Post
If I had started a "Release the Kraken" thread, and then the Kraken Lady herself admitted in defense of a $1.3 billion lawsuit against her that "no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact,”

When you use quotation marks it's supposed to be a quote.

I have read the legal document...Sydney doesn't say that anywhere in it. That is just a typical lie that Democrat lawyers know that you are too stupid to actually look up.

Where do I start?

A. You're Wrong. OMG, you're 100% wrong again, and here's the proof:
.


.
You can go to Forbes magazine and find the link to the pdf. Or, you can go directly to Forbe's pdf upload of the Kraken Lady's pleading here.

B. And You've Made Yourself and This Whole Thread Look Stupid.

You said that you "read the legal document," and that "Sydney doesn't say that anywhere...." In fact, she says it in her legal pleading, the one that you didn't read carefully (or are lying about).

She is basically saying that you are not a reasonable person. That is one thing about which Sydney Powell and I agree.

[MAL]

Where do I start?

A. You're Wrong. OMG, you're 100% wrong again, and here's the proof:
.


.
You can go to Forbes magazine and find the link to the pdf. Or, you can go directly to Forbe's pdf upload of the Kraken Lady's pleading here.

B. And You've Made Yourself and This Whole Thread Look Stupid.

You said that you "read the legal document," and that "Sydney doesn't say that anywhere...." In fact, she says it in her legal pleading, the one that you didn't read carefully (or are lying about).

She is basically saying that you are not a reasonable person. That is one thing about which Sydney Powell and I agree.

i cant believe you were stupid enough to post the proof that you are stupid.
Sydney is inserting case law into her filing. The words and phrases that you are splicing together are a direct quote from a settled case. They are not a direct quote from Sydney, and those are not her words. The context and the use of that wording is directly attributed to the witnesses with sworn affidavits that she was citing. In other words Dominion is suing her for repeating the statements of witnesses that have taken an oath to tell the truth or face the possible penalty of perjury. She is not claiming to be a witness to the charges spelled out in affidavits. That is the entire point of the of using that case law how she used it.

She is claiming that an Attorney can't be sued for repeating a witnesses claims.

I am not making predictions of the outcome of the case, just demonstrating that your handlers believe you are stupid.

[ChiefIllini1]

It is right there in her pleading. My God, man, just look.

This whole thread is a complete self-own, and you don't even realize it.

GO AMERICA!!!

[HuffHall]

There's an old saying in poker, "if you can't spot the sucker at that table, it's you." mal's to far up DT *** to know it's him.

[MAL]

It is right there in her pleading. My God, man, just look.

This whole thread is a complete self-own, and you don't even realize it.

GO AMERICA!!!

I realize its over your head to understand the use of case law to make a legal point...and to discern the difference between the case law cited and the point being made by the quotes from that case is not something that you could possibly understand...or do you realize that you were lying?

[ChiefIllini1]

Even dumb people can see that you're lying. I put a screengrab of it above. So, now, even dumb people know that you will lash out with accusations of lying even while you are being caught lying.

I know it is hard to admit that you're wrong, and I know it must hurt to have your hero, the Kraken Lady, crumble and stab you in the back as soon as she faces any pressure, but you need to face the truth.

The evil that you perpetuate with your obvious lies is the base reason GQP legislatures in Georgia and other states are enacting racist Jim Crow voting laws.

GO AMERICA!!!